this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
54 points (100.0% liked)
NASA
983 readers
1 users here now
Anything related to the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.
Note: This community is an unofficial forum and is unaffiliated with NASA or the U.S. government.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thanks to everyone who shut down speculation. You were right! They are 100% coming back on Starliner. There’s no question at all about safety, and the only reason they haven’t come back yet is because it’s a perfect opportunity to study the problem while Starliner is still in space.
That’s what the article said, right? /s
Gd, we need to get you in the NASA warroom and have you call these shots. Why investigate anything when YOU already knew the result?
This was obvious from the moment there were thruster issues on the way to the ISS. At least to anyone not drinking the Boeing Kool aid.
Investigate all you want. Doesn't change the fact that NASA isn't willing to risk astronaut lives when there are alternatives anymore. Crew Dragon and a Soyuz return were going to clearly be alternative options. The lack of commitment to that, stringing people along on Starliner possibly being used despite additional leaks and already experiencing thruster issues just reeked of Boeing PR trying to save face with everything else going on.
Commenters were shut down by people repeating Boeing PR because THEY already knew the outcome.