Science Memes

11004 readers

2947 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

872

Peer review (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 70 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It's a numbers game.

X submits paper to Journal 1, and peers A,B,C reject it.
X submits paper with minor changes to Journal 2, and only peers D and E reject it.
X submits paper with minor changes to Journal 3, and only peer G rejects it
X submits paper with minor changes to Journal 4, and no one rejects it.

Journal 4 increments prestige, Scientist X increments prestige, but nothing true or good is actually gained.

Science.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did peer F get murdered for indicating they were going to reject the paper? 🔍🧐

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

peer F accepted the paper

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

F

To doubt

[+] [email protected] -20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He typed using technology that wouldn't exist but for Science.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I believe in the scientific method. I believe in peer review.

I just don't like that scientific journals have become so commodified that a lesser journal would accept volumes of bad science and bad review in order to boost its rankings whilst boosting the prestige of the scientist who is measured on the quantity of their work and not the quality.

Entire paper mills exist purely for this reason, and it's a scourge on the scientific community.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fair. TY for clarifying

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah that wasn't at all the impression I got from their first comment