this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
300 points (97.8% liked)
2meirl4meirl
1005 readers
217 users here now
Memes that are too meirl for /c/meirl.
Rules:
-
Respect the community. If you're not into self-deprecating/dark/suicidal humor then this place isn't for you. Kindly just block and move on. This is just how some of us cope.
-
Respect one another.
-
All titles must begin with 2meirl4meirl. This is for multiple reasons. One is just so you can be lazy with titles but another is so people who aren't into this kind of humor can avoid it.
-
Otherwise just the general no bigotry, no dickishness, no spam, no malice, etc stuff.
Sidebar will be updated when I feel like and considering I'm Sadboi extraordinaire we'll see when that will be.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I never understood the 5-year plan thing
How the fuck am I gonna know what's gonna happen
It’s more about giving yourself a goal to work toward. Yes, things change and are not always within your ability to control. Be fluid with your goals, but continue to work for them.
Example:
Easy-peasy. They’re not super specific, and when things happen, I’ll adjust to accommodate. But it gives me something to focus on in the long term.
Management? Fuck that, I don't need to deal with more other people's bullshit.
Double what you're investing each month? If you start with a dollar, you'll be investing almost $17MM/mo. after two years. Maybe that's not the best goal.
The deck project is a good idea tho
Perhaps it would have been better worded as “double your monthly investment”
Tell me how you plan to double your money every month.
“I currently make a monthly investment of $200 a month. In 5 years, I would like to have doubled that investment to $400 a month”
Including the “monthly” in the original comment is admittedly unnecessary but I feel like it’s pretty obvious what they actually meant.
Clearly it was not obvious.
Including monthly is not unnecessary, it makes it mean something completely different than "double after 5 years". As the other comment(s) should have indicated. So if that was what you wanted to say, then it was simply wrong to include it, not unnecessary.
Wasn’t my comment, you can just sorta think “huh, that doesn’t make sense” and clearly some people will post smug comments and some will think “oh, they probably meant this perfectly reasonable alternative”.
True, it is easy to fall into the "no time left to think about something else" when trying to disprove someone. Kind of like not thinking about the pink elephant when someone mentions it. Your meta analysis is spot on and I am honestly sorry that I am this way. I constantly look for errors in everything.
I’m privileged enough to be fairly content. I don’t see the need.