this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
269 points (96.9% liked)

AssholeDesign

7604 readers
2 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Gift articles previously were accessible just with the link. The latest article I attempted to read now requires me to first sign up

edit

The article in question https://wapo.st/4fp62oH

I am well aware of many work arounds. The point of this post was to show wapo has changed the way gift articles work, which previously didn’t require a workaround

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I have some issues with WaPo's reporting at times, but honestly, how do we expect to fund quality journalism if we never pay for news?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I don't disagree, but ideally quality journalism should be treated as a public good, as it's, well, a source of information about the world, an extention of education, you could say

A lot of European countries have tax-supported independent news organizations

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Publicly funded news corporations with journalistic freedom would be nice

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We just read free fearmongering content on right wing extremist websites instead, duh

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

The right answer is through memes and 4chan

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I am fine paying for news. My main problem is these newspapers use manipulation to spread their news. They use cookies to limit the number of articles you can read. This allows people that can see the article thinking everyone else can. Also the entire article can be read by search engines. So when people are searching for certain info, the find the article and they are paywalled. It's a major waste of time. Just don't allow those articles to be searched then.

On top of all that the offers the give are introductory. They will have a signifcant jump afterwards. They will hound you to resubscribe and sell your information for as much as they legally (usually) can.

[–] randombullet 1 points 4 months ago

This article is reposted. Or mirrored or whatever.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/these-cheap-loans-are-becoming-a-hit-with-home-buyers-but-there-are-catches/ar-BB1qJ72W

I'd rather fund quality original news none-for-profit. But all major news articles are in it for the money. How do you expect me to pay for something that has a vested interest in making money off the stuff they report?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

As much as I hate them, ads. The same newspapers have always made money. Along with the Wikipedia route of asking for donations