Technology

58303 readers

8 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

630

Traveling this summer? Maybe don’t let the airport scan your face. (www.vox.com)

submitted 3 months ago by AnActOfCreation to c/[email protected]

154 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Travelers can opt out of facial recognition at US airports by requesting manual ID verification, though resistance or intimidation may occur.
Facial recognition poses privacy risks, including potential data breaches, misidentification, and normalization of surveillance.
The Algorithmic Justice League's "Freedom Flyers" campaign aims to raise awareness of these issues and encourage passengers to exercise their right to opt out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Exactly. I live near SLC, and to get to SF would take:

~19 hours by train and cost $92 in coach
~11 hours by car - $60 in gas in my hybrid, $130 in my minivan
~2 hours by plane - <$50 by plane (Frontier)

And that's a route with a direct train connection, so literally no transfers. So, a train takes way longer, is probably more expensive (esp. if I take family), and I'd probably need a rental car on the other end. And that's for a "best case" scenario with direct train service.

Screw that, trains anywhere other than the east coast of the US makes pretty much no sense for transportation. As an experience, sure, but not to get from A to B.