this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
69 points (94.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43943 readers
473 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By greatest invention I mean something that had big and positive influence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 67 points 5 months ago (4 children)

We are in a time where a single invention can rarelt be great. For technological development you need thousands of small inventions, each that use previous technological breakthrough through decades of research. And even great things we have, are just refinement and miniaturization of things we already had.

But if a single thing had to be said, I would say mRNA vaccines. Covid vaccines saved milions of lives, were developed in record times, and their technology could be used for HIV or even antitumoral vaccines.

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Came here to say it.

The heroic inventor story is archaic.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

but the research began already back in the 60s.

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

That's why I'm saying that a single invention that changed the world is not something you can easily find anymore.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

That's why I'm saying that a single invention that changed the world is not something you can easily find.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Was going to say that too. Regardless of the motives and driving forces behind the incredible speed at which the vaccines were developed (i.e. certainly a similar urgency could be applied to other diseases killing thousands and millions in poorer countries, but there ain't as much interest in that), the mRNA technology proved quite powerful and an avenue to continue exploring in future research.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

People forget that the research behind those vaccines had been going on for 30+ years. What was accelerated was the trials and the gathering and analysis of efficacy and safety data. The actual vaccine technology had been in existence for around a decade at the time.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

You're right, I often forget about that. It's still an incredible achievement.

[โ€“] starman 2 points 5 months ago

The first successful transfection of designed mRNA packaged within a liposomal nanoparticle into a cell was published in 1989. "Naked" (or unprotected) lab-made mRNA was injected a year later into the muscle of mice.

But on the other hand, first human test was in 2001