this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024

135 points (99.3% liked)

News

23014 readers

4 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

135

FDA advisors voted against MDMA therapy – researchers are still fighting for it (www.bbc.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Some 13 million Americans struggle with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Existing therapies only bring relief for a fraction of patients, and new treatments are sorely needed, according to psychiatrists wrestling with the scale of the problem. So, there was distinct disappointment when an advisory committee at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voted earlier this month against a therapy that many had hoped could offer the first new treatment for PTSD in 25 years.

A number of experts who study psychedelics have since spoken out in support of MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD and have sharply criticised the recommendations of the FDA's Psychopharmacological Drugs Advisory Committee. But some are still optimistic that the treatment might be approved when the FDA delivers its final decision in August.

Ahead of the meeting, FDA approval of MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD seemed likely, says Sandeep Nayak, an assistant professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University, who investigates psychedelics as treatments for substance use and mood disorders. About two-thirds of people who received three sessions of MDMA and talk therapy no longer qualified for a PTSD diagnosis at the end of two Phase 3 clinical trials.

It's an outcome that is "almost double that of existing medications", says Gül Dölen, a neuroscientist at the University of California, Berkeley, who researches the mechanisms of how psychedelics achieve therapeutic effects. "What's more, [the treatment] led to durable improvements in these patients lasting at least six months."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The ones that scientifically support your statements.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm going to go ahead and let you scroll back to my earlier conversations on this topic if you don't have any specifics you're curious about.

It's all in the post history.

If you want something new or specific that wasn't covered, let me know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You have exactly zero studies in any of your prior posts and you're telling me to go back and look anyway?

Either support what you say or sit down.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I can't help you if you don't know how to scroll.

But that's not on me.

I'm sure there's some YouTube tutorial you could watch.

I support what I say. You apparently don't know what you're looking for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You apparently don't understand what facts are or how to find them ... preferring to blame others for your own failures.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If it makes you more comfortable to ascribe your ineptitude to others, I'm happy to help.

There's got to be a video tutorial somewhere out there that can teach you how to scroll, though.

Might be easier than you having to make all this stuff up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Might be easier if you find proof for your statements.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

It was pretty easy the first time.