this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
844 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
16 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] catch22 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I call bs, a motorcycle provides way less protection. And which states are they illegal in? Lobbying and another money grab from corporations in our "free market" society. I would love one of these BTW.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Motorcycles have different licensing requirements, and come with caveat emptor that they are inherently unsafe in a motor vehicle accident.

That's not to say bikes don't have any safety at all... there is R&D that goes into making them safe in a collision... as safe as they can be.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

That's not to say bikes don't have any safety at all... there is R&D that goes into making them safe in a collision... as safe as they can be.

Yup. I survived a high-side collision after being sideswiped by an SUV. Thanks to modern safety gear, I only had minor injuries with little long-term beyond an ankle to lets me sense slight changes in atmospheric pressure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why can't we just accept that the KEI is less safe then?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Anyone who buys a Kei car already knows this just by looking at it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm always shocked by this. In a world with seatbelt laws, crumple zones, backup cameras, pinch protection, etc we allow people to ride motorcycles that consistently get injured or killed. How they haven't gotten banned or stupidly restricted is beyond me. Even with a motorcycle lane, getting in a wreck at 75mph would be seriously bad.

In my state, I'm pretty sure you can ride a motorcycle legally with a helmet and a tshirt on, but get pulled over and fined for not wearing a seatbelt, lol.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The seat belt is to prevent you from being thrown through the glass and body/frame of the vehicle. Because that's generally what kills unseatbelted people in a wreck. A motorcyclist will be thrown from their vehicle if hit but is much less likely to hit that vehicle at 70mph. That's why you dress for the slide so to speak. It's about how you land as much as anything. And when you're inside a vehicle and being tossed around you are basically a reverse pinata.

https://youtube.com/shorts/6nnc4-DjnUg?si=rauxW1b6LQOmhuho