this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
1355 points (97.5% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
7 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  1. So does windows for the most part

  2. Do you know how often users actually restart their machines without being forced?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps the solution is to figure out how to update without restarting. It is a hard problem, but a forced restart is the same as a crash from a user perspective.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Imagine if they replaced the crash screen with a fake automatic update.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Years ago there was a screensaver that showed a fake "upgrading to Vista, please wait" screen. Just wait for someone to leave their computer unattended, download and set it as the screensaver, and wait for their reaction when they're back :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That's some oblivion on xbox shit right there. Hide a restart with a loading screen.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you know how often users actually restart their machines without being forced?

If Windows would actually shut the fuck down when asked to do so, this wouldn’t be a problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I complained enough at my work about this that we shut off fast boot domain wide. I haven't had to have a "I know that you just turned your computer on but I need you to restart it. No, not shutdown and turn on, restart. Yes, they are different things." conversation in a couple years. Funnily enough I haven't seen anyone complain about the significantly longer start up times. I guess people just expect that from windows lol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I think people just don't care about startup times. They do it maybe once per day (if they don't sleep and resume), and they probably get a coffee or something while it's starting up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Walk in, press on button, hang up jacket and get stuff out of bag, type in password, grab coffee.

That’s a pretty common morning pattern I see.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

No Windows doesn't do atomic updates in the background, that's why there is the whole installing updates screen on reboot or shutdown.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes it does? As far as I'm aware even Linux can't apply updates to an active system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

You vastly misunderstand both what I am talking about, and how updates work on both Windows and Linux.

You don't press shut down and then get a blue updating screen that stops you from doing anything on Linux. Go and update a Linux system and you will see what I am talking about. You run it just like a normal command or program.

Also yes they update the files on the drive while the system is running.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Fairly often if it wasn't for the whole fast startup thing, which isn't present in Linux land. I would say at least every couple of weeks, which is good enough for updates.