SneerClub

989 readers

1 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

another banger from Roko, definitely a thinker of a time. I would first guess that this time it was a trans woman he came onto and she kicked him in the nuts (x.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Women have two niches in life: looking beautiful and making babies

The first niche will be taken by sexbots

The second by artificial wombs

Society will suddenly realize it doesn't need women and those in power will quickly start replacing and disempowering them.

People like to consider the positive implications of technology but they don't like to consider the negative implications

The smart strategy for women would be to ban ALL of the following:

sexbots

artificial wombs

trans women

Nobody except women should be allowed to look sexy(feminine sexy), look female or bear children.

To some extent TERF women like @jk_rowling are smart enough to realize that it's essential to defend the female monopoly on this stuff. But the average woman just isn't strategic enough to go along with this, and there's (as always) a collective action problem so you get defectors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As always, Valerie Solanas had the better plan sixty years ago.

Whether to continue to use females for reproduction or to reproduce in the laboratory will also become academic: what will happen when every female, twelve and over, is routinely taking the Pill and there are no longer any accidents? How many women will deliberately get or (if an accident) remain pregnant? No, Virginia, women don't just adore being brood mares, despite what the mass of robot, brainwashed women will say. When society consists of only the fully conscious the answer will be none. Should a certain percentage of men be set aside by force to serve as brood mares for the species? Obviously this will not do. The answer is laboratory reproduction of babies.

[...]

Why produce even females? Why should there be future generations? What is their purpose? When aging and death are eliminated, why continue to reproduce? Why should we care what happens when we're dead? Why should we care that there is no younger generation to succeed us.

Eventually the natural course of events, of social evolution, will lead to total female control of the world and, subsequently, to the cessation of the production of males and, ultimately, to the cessation of the production of females.

[+] [email protected] -11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This was incredibly optimistic and naive. Many if not most women are obsessed with having children. I've had three of my long-term relationships and because I have no interest in having children, Ditto for many of my buddies. Most women aren't having children because men force them to.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The woman-explainer has arrived in the thread.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

lol at the guy going 'well achtually women do like being brood mares, and that is why I the stud, and my stud friends, have to break up with them, the brood mares demand our sperm it is too much! Where is my fainting couch!' In reaction to you posting a quote from Valerie Solanas of all people.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

mansplaining the scum manifesto is a vibe

[+] [email protected] -12 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Sounds like the kind of thing somebody would say when they know that I'm right and hate the fact. I'm guessing you went and looked up statistics?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

Oh, but you’ve provided us with statistics! Please, though, for the peer reviewers: we need the baseline measurement. How many women do you date who don’t break up with you? And are they all in Canada?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Which is more likely:

You believe that half the human race lacks the agency and interiority that you theoretically enjoy
OR
You desperately crave human interaction and will take any attention that comes your way, even if it's negative

That's no way to live, is it? Do better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

@o7___o7 As this is human perception and emotion being discussed, the viewpoint is not inconsistent with the emotion. I’ve known people who exhibit both together.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Spoken like a man who jerks it to tradwife Midjourney pics. Can't get it up unless the fingers look wrong, can you?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

this is the type of incredibly divorced energy that doesn’t play particularly well outside of twitter

since you seem like someone’s bad takes alt and your response to @[email protected] was low-effort debatebro shit and then crickets: I’m afraid our instance is breaking up with you. please run and tell your buddies it had nothing to do with your personality; clearly the fediverse just wants your babies.