this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)

Melbourne

1865 readers
60 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is from May but I just saw it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Financially vulnerable Australians stand to miss out on the full value of the budget's $300 energy bill relief, because the policy will slash the indexation of their welfare payments.

The surprising outcome is the result of the government's claim that its energy relief will lower inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), by half a percentage point in 2024-25.

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers were asked to explain why they had given $300 to well-paid politicians and even billionaires like Gina Rinehart.

Economists have disputed the significance of that claim this week, since the Reserve Bank does not focus on headline CPI, preferring instead to monitor an 'underlying' measure of inflation which will be unaffected by the policy.

Similar results would be seen in share houses with multiple welfare recipients, since the energy bill relief is paid by household, but the lower indexation affects each individual.

And Cassandra Goldie, chief of welfare advocacy group ACOSS, said it was "extraordinarily wasteful" and accused the government of "cruelly denying people receiving unemployment payments decent income support."


The original article contains 863 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!