this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
43 points (92.2% liked)

Git

2826 readers
36 users here now

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Resources

Rules

  1. Follow programming.dev rules
  2. Be excellent to each other, no hostility towards users for any reason
  3. No spam of tools/companies/advertisements. It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.

Git Logo by Jason Long is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I used CVS and ClearCase before moving into Git, and it took me some time to adjust to the fact that the cost of branching in Git is much much less than ClearCase. And getting into the "distributed" mindset didn't happen overnight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Omg so this. Also merging main branches into feature branches instead of rebasing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What is the advantage of rebasing?

[–] lysdexic 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What is the advantage of rebasing?

You get a cleaner history that removes noise from the run-of-the-mill commit auditing process. When you audit the history of a repo and you look into a feature branch, you do not care if in the middle of the work a developer merged with x or y branch. What you care about is what changes were made into mainline.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Good to know. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Instead of a commit history, you get a commit fairy tale, which is prettier than the truth, but probably less useful. You get something akin to merging the base branch into the feature branch but things look as if they were done in an order they weren't instead of getting an 'ugly' merge commit.