sysgen

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

Saturation attacks (fire more cruise missiles than it has interceptors to defend itself) are a pretty sure fire way. You can buy 8000 cruise missiles for the cost of a single carrier.

Alternatively, antiship ballistic missiles, super long range torpedoes/unmanned submarines.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I'm not opposing the research, I'm opposing the implementation. Spending trillions of dollars because >1% of the population would be inconvenienced as you showed by having to use less developed or more expensive alternative is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Investing trillions of dollars into dead ends is, however, the enemy of progress. The ressources we're throwing at replacing existing cars with EV cars would be enough to implement better solutions.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes! And you know what, at that point, given the size of a minimum viable car, we could use some kind of algorithm to match people that are going similar places, and put them together to be more efficient. And I bet we'd find that a lot of the large scale transit patterns are common large parts of the population, so we could even use some kind of segregated, higher speed, more frequent vehicle for that.

While we're at it, we might as well just warehouse some of these vehicles around places where the common cores end and start, and then we would only have to match one end of the trip.

Oh wait, we already have those in operation in China: https://m.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=wvNOTZZeYVs

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

Xiaomi, Oppo, and Vivo phones have Google Play outside of China.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chinese shipbuilding is very overwhelmingly civilian.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The difference between MAD and the Samson option, is that in the former you're only attacking whoever attacked you, while in the former you're attacking bystanders that refused to intervene on your behalf.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, it is, but until the fireball is smaller than a pixel, you will see a reduction in the number of pixels illuminated, and then a reduction in exposure. And I'd wager that for a sizeable bomb it will take a while for that reduction in exposure to mean you stop clipping the sensor, especially at night with the ISO dialed up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah you can't, they'll be bright enough to saturate the sensor.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because it's not true. Israel decides what comes in and out, otherwise they threaten either airstrikes or to reinvade the border region. The one thing Israel doesn't object to is to allow all Gazans to leave, but that's because they want Gaza to repopulate so they can seize it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The condition for Israel pulling out of the border was that they would decide what gets in or out. When Egypt yesterday wanted to provide fuel and supplies, Israel threatened an airstrike.

view more: next ›