sidekickplayah

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

It hit for me yesterday. Been gloomy and gray these last 2 days and I'm in love

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I tried to keep posting, but it definitely felt like more people unironically hated it than anything so I stopped. I love him so much and his ability to keep impeccable time, don't let the meme be a dream

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I actually haven't even heard about this tbh, usually I just see another massacre of civilians in the news and go about my day feeling like shit

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

At this point I've just kind of realized that there is no argument to be had with them. Not that their stubborn, but genuinely. It's not that they can't be critical of Hamas that they're arguing, but that their criticism is responded to by "whataboutism" (so says them). Which isn't even an argument so much as a statement? Like I guess yea, if you say so? But the original article is talking about a bombing in a civilian safe-zone that may not even have killed Hamas militants, so criticism of Israel is expected, even in replies of criticism if Hamas. If anything they are just complaining about the way they were responded to, which I don't even know what the response they want is? I've concurred with said criticism, but that doesn't seem to be it either? I genuinely don't know what there is to say, or what they want if it's not agreement with their criticism. Maybe that the criticism should be unchallenged? But again this is a thread about IDF bombs killing civilians in a "safe zone". Either way I don't think it's worth your time, as they can't even commit to ending conversations that aren't "worth their time."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm saying that you are bringing back a discussion had many times over and trying to claim that no one has had it. It's redundant. The article is about an action by Israel, of course the discussion is gonna be about that action.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That's really it? I thought it would actually be something important. I actually even agreed with your criticism of Hamas. Like, it's been needless to say that criticism of Hamas has been had already, since way before this thread. Since October 7th even. Your time is being wasted because you wasted it yourself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Again, what is your argument?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Where is your answer?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Tell me what criticism of Hamas accomplishes then. They went and killed a thousand innocent Israelis, they hide among civilians, resulting in said civilians deaths. What now? Do I get a gold star for pointing out the terrorists? Do the dead get to cheer that their death meant another Hamas militant died (or didn't in the case of this article)?Are the living supposed to feel grateful to Israel that their family and friends are dead, needless to say hateful towards Hamas for hiding amongst them? What is the goal here? What are me, and the dozens of other people here, missing that only you seem to see? And again I will point it out, this entire thread started when you saw an article takling about Israel's recent mistake, and said "But why isn't anyome criticising Hamas?"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Tell me what criticism of Hamas accomplishes then. They went and killed a thousand innocent Israelis, they hide among civilians, resulting in said civilians deaths. What now? Do I get a gold star for pointing out the terrorists? Do the dead get to cheer that their death meant another Hamas militant died (or didn't in the case of this article)?Are the living supposed to feel grateful to Israel that their family and friends are dead, needless to say hateful towards Hamas for hiding amongst them? What is the goal here? What are me, and the dozens of other people here, missing that only you seem to see?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (16 children)

But they are, that is the situation we are in. At every point we can say Hamas is a piece of shit group for using human shields, but that's not gonna change the situation. You keep saying that Hamas isn't getting enough criticism, but I think bombardment by the IDF is criticism enough. The whole ask is, stop shooting through the human shields to kill the bad guys. Even here there is doubt that there even was Hamas hiding with civilians to begin with. We are just giving Israel loads and loads of money, but we can't even get a more definitive answer than "we said so"? At this point I can only think that, even if by some chance Israel really isn't commiting a genocide, the end result will be indistinguishable from it. Palestine and it's people will be erased physically or culturally and we are allowing it to happen, and any pointing that out is met with "Hamas is the one using them as shields" or "Hamas started it". Hamas is unconscionable. Israel isn't, or atleast they say they aren't.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nice I got the CIA Award for Journalism

111
It's Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
 

This is my first time growing strawberries, and one set of plants has been thriving, but this set has these black discolorations and seems to be stunted. No discoloration on the bottom of the leaves, and some of the ones with these spots have folded inward and feel papery. What's going on and how can I treat this? Both plant sets receive basically the same care.

463
Plants VS Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
108
It's Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
617
Two Sentence Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
112
It's Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
144
It's Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
61
It's Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
131
It's Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
599
Frying Chicken Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
106
It's Rulesday (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
285
Lucky Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›