roy_mustang76

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Not without Supreme Court fuckery. As it stands, he'd be eligible to serve as Speaker, but he'd be skipped in the line of succession if it were applicable.

Of course, trusting the Supreme Court to actually follow the rules seems naive at best these days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's possible, though I suspect it's more a byproduct of rigidity - she's fine at her job when everything is straightforward and/or predictable, but goes to pieces when choices aren't binary.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

That's the hope, but clearly we see that hope and a quarter gets you 25 cents and that's all

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Bernie also never faced Trump in an actual head-to-head matchup, so we'll never really know, will we?

I think Bernie stood the best chance at beating Trump in 2016, with the benefit of hindsight. I also think he could have beat Trump in 2020 (though, 2020 was a booby trap because there was no getting through COVID without some kind of economic downside). I don't think Bernie's message overcomes the simplistic logic at play in the electorate - "things didn't seem as expensive 4 years ago".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have a coworker who has been with my company as long as I've been in this entire career that we are both in. Between the two of us, I am the expert, because if something goes one iota off the rails, she can't handle/process it. This is a problem because shit goes off the rails ALL THE TIME in our business. How she hasn't figured out how to handle that in 15 years, I don't know

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bernie would not have won in 2024. In hindsight, it seems clear that winning in 2020 was at best a booby trap. If Trump had won re-election, the Republicans would be grappling with inflation anger (since absolutely none of his policy preferences would have slowed it, if anything they would have accelerated inflation)

Now, as usual, the Republican is going to get credit for the hard choices the Democrat had to make in office and the vibes that "Republicans are better for the economy" will continue, unless his tariffs fuck everything up so quickly that even the oblivious can't ignore it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Given that we have a President who won't be trying to conduct his own coup currently... Yes

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

As he honestly should. Dude's too high on his own supply.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

He had it at 70/30, when the poll/pundit environment was giving Hillary 95% chances.

He gave much more realistic odds than most any pundit of that cycle.

[–] [email protected] 147 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's a shame that Federal law supersedes state law, huh Texas?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

If anywhere near that amounts of armed idiots shows up to DC this time, I'm certain the National Guard will be waiting for them.

We saw the limits of relying on Capital Police and DC Metro Police last time. A Biden admin transitioning to a Harris admin is not going to make that mistake again, and the MD National Guard will probably be ready and waiting for the assistance call like the one that came way too late 4 years ago.

view more: next ›