pfm

joined 8 months ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 38 points 4 hours ago (16 children)

Why marry a turd in the first place? ๐Ÿคท

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your body? You mean body of knowledge?

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

But where's Saddam? ๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

It would be as good as letting MS Song Smith generate soundtrack for "Whiplash" ๐Ÿคญ

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Hasn't anybody told him what eating pussy means?

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Could someone explain how they're going to drive 407 km/h in traffic jam? Or in a city, in general?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I definitely agree that too many comments is often a bad sign, esp. when large part of them is obviously generated.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As mentioned in my other comment, names will rarely explain the reasons why a given solution was chosen. These reasons are important from maintenance perspective and should be recorded next to the relevant code.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're definitely not the only one.

In my opinion the important information we should record in comments is WHY, because the code can only explain HOW, maybe WHEN, but never WHY. If we don't know WHY, any refactoring done in the future could break the logic by ignoring assumptions made by the authors.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Thanks for making me aware ๐Ÿ™‡

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Per aspera ad Aster

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You could step up for animals while still being a nice person - it was your decision not to.

view more: next โ€บ