nude

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'll just point out that I never suggested anyone defederate from anyone.
As a side point though, lots of places had already defederated from lemmynsfw.

I just want a NSFW instance that doesn't cater to pseudo child porn

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No I did, and they said

We’re allowing non-IRL underage looking content

Then they go on to say there is a difference between teen and child, and then backtrack and say "noooo we banned loli", after posting a thread titled

We’re allowing non-IRL underage looking content

edit:
And now the title of the post is

We're (not) allowing non-IRL underage looking content

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I don't know how people can be arguing against a post that is literally titled

We’re allowing non-IRL underage looking content

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Post title

We’re allowing non-IRL underage looking content

I'm telling people who don't want to see pics of naked kids that this particular instance is cool with that.

You're defending that instance.

I'm not throwing a fuss bud

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bud, you call a picture of a nude kid whatever you want.
I'll call it whatever I want

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you point out where I said to defederate?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, I'm warning people who don't want to see pictures of naked kids that the instance is cool with that content.

Hentai isn't the issue. The issue is

We’re allowing non-IRL underage looking content

Most people don't want that. If you do, more power to ya bud

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The post title, direct quote

We’re allowing non-IRL underage looking content

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The heading of the post is, and I quote

We’re allowing non-IRL underage looking content

Maybe they minced words being non English as their first language.
I understand that, languages are tough.
That said, the fact that it isn't a hard line on that shit is enough for the majority of people to want another instance.

I'm not trying to have them closed. I'm not fronting a resistance to have people not go there. As far as I'm concerned its "legal" and whatever, but at the end of the day the majority of people are not only not interested, but disgusted by that.

Being real here, if I'm looking at nude content, as lots of us do, there is some stuff I don't want to see. Underaged content is on that list. I would safely assume that is on the list for many people.

The point of this thread is to warn other "normies" that the people running that instance are cool with this sort of thing, and ask if there is an alternative yet. lemmynsfw can and will do whatever they want. I'm fine with that, its not the point here. The point is warning others and asking for an alternative.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you want to be daft about the situation, more power to ya bud.

Its clear in context what the implication of allowing that content is, being contrary isn't going to change anything

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Again, not here to discuss the nuance of drawn pictures of naked kids.
Not trying to shut down the instance.

I don't care.

I'm just warning people who don't like that shit, that is most people, that the instance owner is cool with that content so if you aren't into it then probably look elsewhere.
A secondary point was asking if there are any alternatives yet.
I know there will be, I'm just wondering if there is

view more: ‹ prev next ›