nirogu

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

@astray yeah, that could be an option, but if more users exist in that machine then other processes might fail as that instance is part of a bigger cluster that has several processes running. It might not be a big deal, but checking that may still need some work. I'd prefer a way to do it without creating new users, if it exists

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Impressive results! Only wished they had shared some code or any way to replicate the experiments easily

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Very well explained! Especially given how difficult RL can be sometimes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@Link @linux Yep, writing from Tusky right now. The fediverse is great :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Rustmilian @linux Yeah, it's close to impossible to find documentation on what to do here. I'm trying to find out how is it that Fedora works well with the same hardware, and even considering changing the card itself, but for the moment at least my connection is much more stable after setting the iwlwifi.conf file
Once again, thank you for your help!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@Link @linux Yeah the kernel changes nothing, I might have to change to intel because I dont know what else to do at software level
About the @ , I'm using my mastodon account to write all these posts and they are added automatically. Besides thats the best way for the posts I write in mastodon to appear as comments in lemmy clients. If they look weird to you it might be activitypub compatibility bugs but nothing too important :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Kalcifer @linux
[ 5.010372] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
[ 5.108148] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: Detected crf-id 0xbadcafe, cnv-id 0x10 wfpm id 0x80000000
[ 5.108171] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: PCI dev 24fd/0110, rev=0x230, rfid=0xd55555d5
[ 5.137796] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: loaded firmware version 36.ca7b901d.0 8265-36.ucode op_mode iwlmvm
[ 5.556122] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless AC 8265, REV=0x230
[ 5.614915] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: base HW address: 60:f6:77:eb:1e:6e, OTP minor version: 0x0
[ 5.689840] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: iwlmvm doesn't allow to disable HW crypto, check swcrypto module parameter
[ 13.355547] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: Registered PHC clock: iwlwifi-PTP, with index: 0

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Great news. Seems that most of the community uses KDE anyway, so this should make things faster for most installations

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

@Link @linux Yeah, I'm thinking that that could be the way. I've already had a lot of progress maintaining the connection by configuring iwlwifi but it is still way slower than it should

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@Rustmilian @linux Just tried that but no change. iwconfig was not found but I installed it through the wireless_tools arch package. Also confirmed that the linux-firmware package was always been installed with the iwlwifi-8265-34 and iwlwifi-8265-36 files in the folder you said. When I ran the iwconfig wlan0 power off command, there was no error but the connection quality didnt change, so I didnt do the rest of the suggestions
@Link commented they had the same issue but in the end decided that the solution was replacing the realtek card for an intel because the drivers just dont work. Im starting to agree, but still dont know how this issue didnt exist when I had fedora running

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@driving_crooner @linux Just did it, but no change at all. I think that would be the solution if the card weren't recognized, but the issue here is that it connects but erroneously reports weak wifi signal

view more: ‹ prev next ›