Three words: tax the rich
nifty
lol yeah, I am going on two months at least
Checks out
No longer bringing you classic rock, now just house music untz untz untz untz
Anon doing his part for the gpd 🫡
/s
I am not saying that. I am saying that if you take a really rich person and and really poor person, and switch their places, then there’s no guarantee that anything effectively changes about society because innate self preservation tendencies enables us to make similar rational decisions. Systems need to counteract these self preservation tendencies because often times these tendencies can be ruinous to the system they benefit from. Look at everything happening now, for example
The problem isn’t billionaires per se, the problem is not taxing people at higher income levels enough. People with higher incomes will do the rational thing and work towards self-preservation. It’s up to governments to work towards social stability, which is the point of civilization. It’s up to people to hold their governments accountable via democratic action. This model works in a lot of instances, but maligned processes can make it fail.
Aw I am sure sweaty loved her back >.<
That’s not true because a lot of election protection work in the U.S. comes from the Democrats
I am not saying I agree with the article, but I am trying to understand the psychology behind why elections are razor thin even when the Republican candidate is immensely incompetent and unqualified. I think this support is from consistent and strong messaging, which the Dems can lack. Ultimately people want to feel safe against the unknown, economic or otherwise. I am saying the Dems can be stronger about that messaging, I am not saying the Dems need to become autocratic or strongmen.
Hard disagree, I’ll die on this hill 🤷♀️
Doesn’t matter, the only poll that does matter is the election. I hope people vote because the republicans are definitely going to contest the hell out of this one