happyandhappy

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

also listen to nicolas jaar and his project against all odds for some more similar out of the box approaches to electronic production

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

the pianos are synthesized.

there is a decent amount of slight pitch modulation that increases in randomness with sustain. the velocity of each note is also varied which leads to the different sound of each note as they are played. probably a small amount of tremolo is being applied as well.

definitely a bit of unison going on as the higher lead comes in at around 00:21, creating that warm boards of canada sound. its not a super complicated sound but you will need a bit of fucking around with waveshapes if you are trying to create the exact tone.

a really big thing is setting the mix up correctly. the lower sustained notes have a tiny bit of phase sync/position spread unison causing each ear to be playing slightly differently tuned sounds and are mixed quite loud in comparison to the higher lead which is may be mixed mono coated in a bit more reverb giving it a feeling of separation or floating along in the atmosphere created by the lower notes.

@00:57 theres a pad that comes in with a similar combo of detuning/unison and reverb with perhaps a bit of tremolo and a slow attack. some type of low passed triangle ish waveform and multiple voices. @ the same time there is a low passed bass synth pluck that is mixed to be almost panning around the head. probably a square wave with a low pass filter that is attached to a adsr w a hint more attack than the actual synth. lots of unison/multiple voices as well.

when the "And I"s comes in there's a lot of goodies happening with the different reverbs of each sound with some of them like the vocals pretty harshly cutting out & a bit of feedback looping on others. there's also a bit of analog sounding synth atmosphere sounds going on faintly in the back. could be like a additive granular sound.

the really great percussive sounds @ 1:40 during the "all wrapped in cellophane" part is definitely some type of additive/granular synth processing on a couple different percussive sounds with probably 4 variations: a metallic transient one, a slightly slower hat sound, a quite fast hat sound and the little shaker sounding one. My best guess is that the samples being used for the additive synthesis are drum sounds.

the big hook afterwards has a pretty fat kick coming in sounds like it might have a bit of feedback on a small loose reverb and the bass sound is mostly a standard 808 sound with a tremolo.

the clacking percussive noise during the next "and I" section is probably using the same technique as the earlier percussive sounds just with a different sample.

in my opinion the truly gorgeous thing about the production is about how the disparate elements are composed and mixed together to create somewhat shocking and gorgeous sections that are constantly evolving @ every step of the song to provide the power and gravitas to the songwriting and vocals. the overall affect of the various production techniques are to create a kind of rift between the analog synths & sound design feeling like "home" while the alien granular elements provide a cold counterpoint. mirroring the themes of the song it creates a grand feeling of distance and alienation to the feeling of hominess and comfort. also its possible that whatever sound is used for the epiano is also granular synthesis of a epiano sound. and ofc her vocal performance is amazing too.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

could somebody recommend me some good resources on the arab spring

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

that mf uno reverse card lmfao goku-halal trans-uno

[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago (3 children)

not just the media but also the thinktanks that inform policy. would be awesome to see a detailed deep dive in the material ramifications of "supply chain security" we are seeing so much lately

[–] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago (1 children)

dam literally "1984"?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

the style was so nice and refreshing

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

really great effort post! awesome as always cat-trans

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago (9 children)

just learned about nintendo's debt slave wtf

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago

house explodes one day next to langley, the next day a bill is introduced to the House to establish a HUAC for palestinians and their allies what can I say

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago

just emphasizes how based they are

 

I thought it might be a good time for me to write up a actual post about mass line. Both cuz it's a bit of a nebulous concept and typically not defined in its entirety and that it can hopefully help explain to people what use this whole like "federating to onboard cool people" idea has.

Principles of the Mass Line

First off, the mass line is defined in a few different Mao writings including On Practice and Some Questions Concerning Methods of Leadership but the description given never typically identifies the concept for all of its components.

Contrary to some people's belief, mass line did not mysteriously unexist until Mao coined it! Mass line has been a central technique to Marxist-Leninist organizing from the beginning with even CPUSA members notably having written practical pamphlets on it in the 1930s. Mao did however coin the term itself and wrote specifically about it, consolidating and adding to our understanding of it.

Principally the mass line is a method of categorization. The categorization follows that:

  • The Advanced are people who identify that capitalism is the issue and are willing to organize to combat it.

  • The Middle are people who may or may not be aware that capitalism is the issue, but are yet to actively participate in the organizing process. Single issue people are typically the middle.

  • The Backwards are people who are reactive to the idea that capitalism is the issue. Democrat, Republican, Centrist, whoever what we care about is how aware they are that capitalism is the issue and needs to be overcome.

Within each category you can also categorize people as Advanced, Middle or Backwards within their category. There are Advanced (of the) Middle, Middle Backwards, and Backwards Advanced people. These categories serve multiple purposes. The most important thing to note is how the mass line relates to society at large: "through the Advanced we can reach the Middle" and "through the Middle we can move some of the Backwards". The task of "a vanguard" is to organize cadre to organize the Advanced to move the Middle and some of the Backwards. This formula is designed to allow us to pinpoint the leverage points in society.

Using the Mass Line to elevate Class Consciousness

Relevant to our "task" here (not sure if its really important enough to call task cuz i just like this place as a chill environment to hang but ig its a task if you believe it is) is that the mass line can be used as a practical tool to elevate the consciousness of people (it may be more accurate to say that mass line is the process that we use to move people whether we are aware of it or not).

When we are "mass lining" a person, we are trying to investigate their level of class consciousness as well as their class interests and push them to elevate towards a higher level of class consciousness. In essence, investigation is about mapping where somebody is in relation to mass line, and using this information to nudge people towards the next highest level. Online you really can't do any of this so more so its mostly guess work but the principal remains. You won't push the backwards into the advanced and you're wasting your time entirely when you could be doing much better things with your life. The best you can hope for typically is to move the advanced backwards and middle backwards towards the middle. Get them to believe in one of the actual issues of society. This could be incredible wealth disparities, this could be the liberal destruction of community and encirclement of the family, this could be the corruptness of the democracy of the US whatever. The backwards will never be able to accept capitalism in its entirety is the issue in almost all cases. If you can convince somebody to go from Backwards to Advanced in 1 conversation they were never really "Backwards".

What is integration?

When thinking about the middle the most important concept to think about is integration. Integration is about forming unities with the people you are talking to. It is about listening to people and helping them with their issues while elevating their consciousness of them. Again, it is a lot harder to do this online where there are few things you can do to help people with their problems while elevating their consciousness about them, although there aren't none, technically. Successful integration is translating the principles of Marxism naturally and having the person you are talking to easily understand them. Marxism makes sense and people can put it together for themselves if they really experience it and you aren't failing to integrate. Some people's material experiences also will just not have proven the accuracy of Marxism to them and that's okay! That is the whole basis of class struggle.

Summation

In short tl;dr, who gives a fuck about federating with completely backwards websites and users. Complete waste of your time while achieving very little. If your goal is to use federation to "introduce Marxist politics to greater amounts of people" you have to tactically decide on instances where the vast majority of the users are The Middle or The Advanced. Also libs if you are not actually organizing you are the Middle. Advanced Middle, sure, but touch grass and move to the Advanced; it feels good!

view more: next ›