haltowork

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Instead of focusing on ONE positive and acting as if all the negatives are automatically outweighed by that one positive.

i.e. elon muk bad

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes it does. It's China, and then a bunch of unrelated ignoramuses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The substitution needs to be equivalent, not worse.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

There should really be an option to simply hide posts...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you have issues with reading comprehension. I haven't bitched anywhere about any defederation, moderation, censorship or whatever done by instance owners.

Obviously, it's up to them and can lead to better content. It can also lead to echo chambers, but that's an implementation detail.

All I did was point out that censorship is not free speech. Free speech is an ideal that doesn't work in the real world, and it's fine to admit you're not open to everyone having free speech.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

An instance owner can do whatever they want for their own instance.

Calling censorship free speech to make yourself feel better doesn't make it true though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

cool story bro, why do you think it's relevant?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Amazing.

"I'm censoring people so that I can promote free speech!"

Just admit that it's not free speech. That's just a roundabout way to justify your decision when there's no justification required.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not sure how you got to that answer. Censorship isn't free speech.

No one has to support free speech. Just own it instead of making up rubbish like "I'm actually censoring to promote free speech"

view more: next ›