gracicot

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
The move constructor that you have to declare, even though you don't want anyone to actually call it - The Old New Thing in c/cpp
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is actually what I did. I declared it and left a comment to explain why it needed to be left unimplemented.

The move constructor that you have to declare, even though you don't want anyone to actually call it - The Old New Thing in c/[email protected]
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think compiler move return value by default, so even without NRVO you should never move a return value when it's a local non reference variable.

8
The move constructor that you have to declare, even though you don't want anyone to actually call it - The Old New Thing (devblogs.microsoft.com)
6
Trip report: Summer ISO C++ standards meeting (Varna, Bulgaria) (herbsutter.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
0 comments fedilink