Man that's some fucking weasel wording. Will be seen as flying in the face of international law? That would be because it blatantly does.
gnutrino
joined 2 years ago
Look at mr. billionaire over here able to afford eggs
This would likely have been a stalemate anyway.
How come? I'm not very good at chess personally but I was under the impression that queen-bishop-king was generally sufficient to force a mate.
Yes, all *quick google* two of my normal human hands
Privatizing it in the first place is the work of people who are corrupt as hell, inhumanly evil, dumb as rocks, or, most likely, all of the above.
In this case corrupt and evil. Thatcher had tried it twice before and had to back down because it was (and still is) an incredibly unpopular policy that was at risk of losing them the 1987 election. Immediately after the election they privatized the lot before anyone could complain.
It spells penispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenis doesn't it?
'EA/BioWare owns the IP but you can't own an idea'
Isn't owning ideas the whole point of IP laws?
"Some" first world countries? I'm only aware of one...
Landserf would be a more accurate term.
a lot of the pretty CNN idiots are Trump protagonists
Sure, but for Trump it's important not just to have sycophants but to not have any dissent.
Nice to have you over here. May i ask what sort of job are you looking for?