generalpotato

They aren’t even liberals. They don’t have the guts anymore to be actual liberals. They’re slaves to their corporate owners.

Agreed. That “consensus” is another bs talking point to cover up that they yet again alienated their own voters to appease their masters.

This man has always cooked. I wish Dems had the ball to let him have the ticket both times he was snubbed despite cooking what needed to cooked.

By grown in texture I meant that the volume of hair seems fuller. While that can be product/hairstyle, another giveaway is that his hairline def looks like it recedes with age. Picture on the left is the classic, my hairline is receding and I’ve got longer hair to compensate for it. The picture on the right has a hard stop on the hairline and hair growing out exactly where the hairline “stopped” receding.

Got a ton of balding men around me, and grafting is a popular topic of conversation. 🙂

I actually have a pretty thick head of hair for my age.

The only reason we’re commenting on his hair is because his hair seems to have grown in texture and thickness with time and it’s apparent that it’s grafted looking at just the texture alone.

Genetics while playing a great role in anatomy does not reverse the effects of aging and taking care of yourself via cosmetic procedure because it’s part of your job along with a healthy lifestyle goes a long way to put off genetic health risks.

LOL - I didn’t mean to imply that but now that you’ve said it, yeah… that makes sense.

I’m not sure how people here are claiming “genetics” when this is clearly hair implants. Implants are fairly cheap overseas and even cheaper in the States when you’re a multimillionaire (relative to differential in income vs an average person).

People forget that looking good, investing in yourself, staying in shape and cosmetic procedures are a part of their jobs as actors and they’ll do it just like anybody else doing their jobs.

People overestimate genetics in most cases, when the answer is really simple: maintenance.

This is why you don’t pay for breakfast (if you have the option), wake up late at your time and go discover a local spot and some food to eat as breakfast/lunch item.

That sounds like work with extra steps.

I think the requirement for “have to be stated it as a political position” caveat is rooted in malice which has historically skewed the discussion in favor of controlling the narrative in the interest of the agenda at hand, in this case is blind support for Israel.

I remember having to use the same set of qualifiers back in the day during the “War on Terror”, when arguing that mass bombing campaigns would only lead to more extremism. I’d have to state that I didn’t “support terrorism” and the idea was to have an objective discussion around the policies in question.

It’s a tact to suppress valid criticism and garner support.

It was apparent then and it’s apparent now. We cannot have open discussions in the interest of actual progress when folks are implicated into a myopic tribal view of the situation for having an opinion that goes against the common narrative.

Here’s the link that was removed where Biden is actively trying to defer the ICC case calling it outrageous:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/20/politics/biden-denounce-icc-warrant-israel-hamas/index.html

And Biden had nothing to do with this you say? How about the time when the US (Biden’s admin) was actively trying to dissuade ICC from issuing these warrants.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/israel-us-said-working-to-prevent-icc-arrest-warrant-against-netanyahu/ar-AA1nNjDW

Meanwhile the leader of the free world that represents “justice and equality”:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/20/politics/biden-denounce-icc-warrant-israel-hamas/index.html