framboos

joined 1 year ago
[–] framboos 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I might try out those suggestions as well. (The Lunarvim website really reminds me of Spacemacs). I've been trying a few times to get used to Neovim. An editor with the power and documentation of vim and a more "modern" community and support for Lua seems interesting.

However, the last time I gave up after I it required a lot of configuration of plugins to set up autocomplete for Rust. In VS Code it is just a matter of installing the plugin using the already available plugin manager, but it would be nice to have some more flexible alternative. And after typing a few lines I often unintentionally press the Escape key.

Do NvChad or Lunarvim come with a plugin manager where I can just install a package to add support for a language? It appears that both setups use a Lua config file. Does this make a difference for using vim plugins?

[–] framboos 12 points 1 year ago

Reddit provides a platform where regular users create the data. Moderators add value by ensuring the quality. Without any of these parties, there is no valuable data. Of course there is a cost in running the platform, but Reddit should avoid as much as possible charging users and especially moderators for using the platform.

Then there are search engines and 3rd party apps. They also add value. Search engines use the data, and in return they attract new contributors. 3rd party apps also attract regular users, and by providing a better experience make sure that the regular users stay active for longer. They should not be charged more than is required to keep the platform running and is reasonable with respect to their profits.

LLM trainers do not fit in this picture. They use large amounts of data, but do not provide anything in return that is valuable to the users, moderators or platform. Therefore, I absolutely support charging them more for accessing training data.

Users of the platform who provide value in return should not have to pay more than is reasonable and required than to keep the platform running. LLM trainers do not provide value in return, and I support charging them more. It is unreasonable to not differentiate between 3rd party app developers and LLM trainers.

[–] framboos 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for the explanation. So far I have only explored a a few communities. I still have to get used to this platform. Is it possible to see which posts I have upvoted?