dlatch

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It is fairly well known that hackers backed by the Chinese government have targeted and infiltrated critical infrastructure in the West, for example https://theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/19/fbi-china-hack-infrastructure and https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-disrupts-chinese-botnet-targeting-critical-infrastructure-fbi-says-2024-01-31/ . The assumption is that this will be exploited in case of a future conflict.

It is not unthinkable that starting a bunch of fires in houses all across the country to overload emergency services and cause general unrest and chaos, is part of this strategy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It still possibly going to send your designs to China (and you could even question having a device easily capable of starting a fire that is actively connecting to China). The only way I'd use a Bambu is if it's disconnected from the internet all together, but if I'm not mistaken they need a cloud connection to work in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It was cancelled after about a year. They said the technological developments of drones went faster than they could adjust the training of the birds, there were concerns about the well being of the birds but also the risks of using large predators in areas with big crowds, and there wasn't enough control over where the drone would end up - the bird might knock it out of the sky over a crowd.

All in all it seems like the whole idea was just a bit too uncontrollable to work as a counter-terrorism measure at events, which was the goal. The eagles just added a level of uncertainty that was not worth the gains. It might work in a situation like Ukraine though, where it is a more traditional battlefield with few civilians around. On the other hand, the drones used are offen a bit bigger and more advanced than your standard DJI, and that could definitely end up hurting the birds.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You know, even though it's still rewarding Israel's actions in a way, out of all the support the US is giving, this one I probably mind the least. It will prevent further innocent deaths (regardless of what side they are on, this is always a net positive), and it can't be used by Israel against the Palestinian and Lebanese people. Let the US take over all of the defense of Israel if it means they stop delivering bombs and missiles that Israel will use to further their genocide.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think Israel would give a shit either way, and I don't think they would face any more consequences from the international community than some strong words.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Yes, that's why we have dead children now...

[–] [email protected] 161 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

If this was the other way around, we'd have global outrage, days of mourning and piles of new weapons for Israel right now. We'd be speaking about one of the worst terrorist attacks in history.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yes, because Hezbollah members never go outside and are never among innocent people. They just convenietly always sit together, do their shopping in the Hezbollah supermarket and take the Hezbollah-bus to get where they are going. Think, moron.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In the long run they are doing so much damage to the Jewish people. Effectively they're (and by they mean anyone who is shouting "antisemitism" now) creating a situation where you are either supportive of Israel's actions, or against Jews. It's such a destructive approach.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Supply chains are vulnerable as hell. There's photos of NSA agents installing backdoors in Cisco network equipment during the shipping to the customer. There's no proof and it will probably take many years before we hear anything conclusive, but it is without a doubt within the capabilities of Israel or one of their allies intelligence agencies to intercept a shipment of pagers and install explosives in them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Don't do this. Not only is your response actually antisemitic, but relating Israeli and Zionist policy to Judaism is exactly what Netanyahu is doing in order to be able to play the anti semitism card. If you are against Israel's actions, fight to make it clear that it is not the same as Judaism and support the Jewish people that speak out against Zionism and the Israeli government.

view more: next ›