blahaj

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If it's anything like /r/pics, it would be safe to assume those in favour of John will win by a long shot

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I always like to mix in some butter and sriracha

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Excellent news! It's so lovely to see lemmy.world and the threadiverse as a whole grow. It's only gonna get bigger from July 1st

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I completely agree with your points. I alongside many others appreciate the heads up; for some reason `!lemmynsfw doesn't show up on my local feed over there so I never would've seen the post if it weren't for this thread.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

The fact the post was made by a user and not the actual admin certainly contributes to this mess.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh yikes, I didn't even see that comment. The fact that user is making this "clarification", and not the admin themselves concerns me. It reads like they're just piggybacking off the user poster who decided to do their own interpretation. Like others have stated before, there really needs to be a hard line drawn otherwise that instance is going to see a lot of people leaving.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

That is wild, I made an account on there last night so I was curious to find the announcement post. Evidently lots of people are quite outraged. I also noticed as of a few minutes ago a clarification post has been made: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/29826

To quote:

I have so much respect for @[email protected] but i can’t believe how poorly he wrote the update message, lol.

Here is what’s happening;

-     loli/shota are BANNED and not okay in any way.
-     IRL kids are BANNED OBVIOUSLY because no shit.
-     characters who are petite/young-looking but not obviously underage are ALLOWED because as an instance the votes decided that banning all of it was destructive, and differentiating between them can be impossible.

The line will continue to be up to the admins discretion, though we always appreciate input. And beyond this, individual communities can decide whether they want to outright ban all flat-chested etc. porn to be safe.

Any other clarifications necessary, just ask below. Thanks for reading. ~Restful

I'm not sure what to make of all this; it's a bit iffy to me so I'll be on the lookout for another NSFW related Lemmy community. There were a couple of folks in the comments of the original announcement post stating they're gonna make their own instance so we'll see how that pans out.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's always a chance you might have unfortunately been overlooked from the sheer amount of applications the admins have to sort through daily. I had to resubmit my app twice to get through, same answers and all. Got approved in under 30 mins

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If I was high enough and two of those patties were eliminated, I'd absolutely go to town on that burg.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With kbin it's the same syntax as Lemmy but you omit the !; plugging in something like [email protected] into the search bar will have that community's sidebar information appear, and from there you can subscribe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oddly enough even with the proper URL I'm getting a server not found error

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I get more of a early 2000s vibe from the fediverse, with it's smaller, more intimate communities akin to those old school phpBB and vBulletin forums I used to frequent extremely often, but of course more modernized.

view more: ‹ prev next ›