ValueSubtracted

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Additional Thought The First: if Conrad and his group return in the finale, it could give a very different meaning to "The Reality War"...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Totally fair...though competence isn't what one expects from the right-wing reactionaries.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Conrad and Ruby’s relationship had been seeded as a subplot over a few episodes maybe it would have worked better?

The thing that worked really well for me is that I was naturally inclined not to trust him from the start - I have seen an episode of television before, after all - but they seeded just enough misdirection through Conrad's "desire" to be like the Doctor (which carried through to the promotional interviews) to retain some surprise in the reveal.

I did like the scenes with Ruby’s homefront matriarchy

As much as I think Belinda has been a step up from Ruby, it was very nice to see the whole family again.

What can you do when compassion and empathy simply bounces off the person you’re trying to reach? That is a very real and current question, and I’m sort of glad that the show didn’t try to answer that neatly for the sake of a feelgood ending.

It managed to handle things very deftly, while still being very blunt in its messaging (which I don't think is a bad thing). Honestly, coming off of an election in Canada less than a week ago, the whole thing kind of turned my stomach. Really visceral stuff. I can see this being an episode that I return to throughout the week, and I might have more thoughts to share later on.

One thing I really appreciated was the ambiguity of Kate, and how far she's willing to go when the Doctor's not around. They have a fine line to walk in the department, but I think they did it really well here.

One thing I don't appreciate is the inconsistent handling of UNIT over the years. They've got helicarriers, then they're gone, then they're back, then their budget has been slashed, now they're back again...I really hope this episode (and the upcoming spinoff) marks a final commitment to keeping them around as a player. We don't need to see them repeatedly destroyed and resurrected like some kind of Gallifrey.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Flood Watch 2025

"Governor" was capitalized in the subtitles, so I think we've got a name, along with a pretty solid indication that she's a Time Lord.

 

LoglineRuby Sunday faces life back on Earth without the Doctor. But when a dangerous new threat emerges, can Ruby and UNIT save her new boyfriend, Conrad, from the terrifying Shreek?

Written by: Pete McTighe

Directed by: Peter Hoar

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I don't see any glaring incompatibilities with Kinew's agenda. The "build, baby, build" attitude is something they've shared as of late.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Another thing to consider is that many people simply aren't that engaged, and the news ecosystem on both sides of the border has deteriorated to the point where it's very easy to go through life with bad information, or no information at all.

It's probably not that hard for a low-information voter to be swayed by big talk, even if they're not a cultist.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it's a nuanced question - I've heard that the Cuban community in Florida is very Republican because they're seen as stronger against the Cuban regime.

In other cases, I think people are very willing to vote for people who promise to help them with their most immediate problems (regardless of how credible those promises are), and overlook the rest.

And we should never underestimate the willingness of people to close a door behind them once they've gotten through it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

One thing he doesn't touch on (much) is that a significant number of NDP supporters - probably "working class" supporters - seemed to flip to the Conservatives, and not the Liberals.

The party is going to have to reckon with that, too.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

It's probably another move to distance himself from Trudeau's choices.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (16 children)

That's up to the CPC.

Carney said a byelection should be held as quickly as possible to give Poilievre an opportunity to win a seat in the House of Commons, if that’s what the Conservative Party wants.

Carney's message is that he's not interested in playing Parliamentary games. I'm not convinced it's a good idea, but it's an interesting move.

 

The prime minister was asked if he’ll pursue a governing pact with the NDP. “No,” he said.

And why not, the reporter asked.

“Why?” Carney retorted.

The PM said the Liberals campaigned on a clear set of objectives, and while they didn’t quite get a majority, “we will be putting forth legislation that’s consistent with our platform.”

 

Carney said a byelection should be held as quickly as possible to give Poilievre an opportunity to win a seat in the House of Commons, if that’s what the Conservative Party wants.

Poilievre lost his seat in Ottawa's Carleton riding on Monday after holding it for more than 20 years, so he's in the unusual position of being a party leader without a seat.

"I already told Mr. Poilievre that I will trigger a byelection if that is the decision of the Conservative Party," he said in French.

Then, in English: "I will ensure that it happens as soon as possible. No games, nothing."

1
Axiom Q&A Part Two (www.playstartrekonline.com)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Everything I've read says it's a pretty comprehensive overhaul, except maybe the routes along the major arterials.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No sitting PM wants to be seen spending millions on "their" house, and costs have skyrocketed thanks to decades of neglect.

On top of that, the house itself doesn't really meet the needs of the role, and both the house and grounds are considered inadequate from a security perspective.

view more: ‹ prev next ›