UndercoverUlrikHD

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Greta write-up! What clubs are linked to Nico? Barça seems to have trouble making room for Tah, so unless Olmo is sold, I don't see Barça signing him this window.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 2 points 1 week ago

🏆🏆🏆

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 2 points 1 week ago

Great to see the smaller teams pick up some trophies, it's beauty of the cups!

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 0 points 1 week ago

Isnt it not better to do variations of all chest exercises?

Like on Push A Barbell Benchpress you can load heavier weight and on Push B I could load less cause of stabilising muscles for Dumbbell Bench?

Unless your goal is to limit strength gains, not really. Within a meso cycle you want some form of specificity to help drive the neural adaptations. You can load heavy in Push A and lighter on Push B by simply modulating the target rep range. E.g. 5 reps on Push A (heavy) and 10 on Push B (light).

As a beginner your technique is unlikely to be nailed down, so repetition of a movement is a huge boon. Barbell benching twice a week instead of once a week is twice the amount of time improving the movement pattern.

I chose easy movements cause I dont understand deadlifts etc. without injuring myself.

I can understand that hip hinges may seem intimidating due to all the injury misinformation surrounding it. If you don't want to do it, don't do it. But if you're on the fence, my recommendation would be to start out light and keep it light until you're more comfortable. I do believe you're greatly missing out without RDLs or Good Mornings in your program though.

If you won't do any hip hinges, I would recommend to place your feet high up on the leg press platform, otherwise your glutes won't really be trained in this program.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

491 interviews in 182 days, or ~2.7 interviews per day. No wonder he looks so tired all the time, must be exhausting.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 2 points 1 week ago

Nice to hear it won't be demolished

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Notes on the plan:

You haven't including the number of sets, which is a vital part of the plan.

What's the progression plan?

Way too many exercises. You would be better off with fewer exercises per muscle and use some form of daily undulating periodisation. Give yourself some time to learn and become proficient at certain movements. Too many different exercises will only slow down your progression. (note: I'm not talking about volume since you haven't provided that)

The rep scheme also doesn't make much sense, why do you want to have the same rep range for every exercise in a workout? Lateral raises for sets of 6 sounds suspect. Some exercises doesn't work all that well in low rep ranges (like lateral raises) and some doesn't work all that well in high rep ranges (squat, deadlift, etc...). You'll likely find yourself limited by your cardiovascular system rather than leg strength for those 15 rep squat sessions. It took me a fair amount of sessions to find the right pace when going from sets of 5 to sets of 10 on the squat.

No RDL or deadlifts? Your glutes, hamstrings and erectors doesn't get much love in this plan.

Recommendations:

I would scrap the plan of having a fixed rep range for each workout, and don't change the rep range week to week. Instead you can do daily undulating periodisation of exercises within the week. E.g. You might do sets of 5 on the bench press on Monday, and then do sets of 10 on Thursday.

Lower the amount of variation of exercises for your pull and push days. E.g. you don't need to do both the barbell and dumbbell variations of the same exercise. Either do barbell bench press both days, or do dumbbell bench press. Cut down the curl variations to 2 exercises. Choose between reverse pec deck or face pull, chest supported row or cable row, etc...

For you leg days you're really missing out on hamstrings and glutes. Lying leg curls alone really doesn't cut it. I'd recommend cutting out either Bulgarian split squats or leg extensions and add RDLs into the mix. Done properly, RDLs will hit hamstrings and glutes like no other exercise. You should probably rotate between squatting first and doing RDL first, e.g. Squats first on Wednesday and RDL first on Saturday. Also, don't do sets of 15 on squats if you haven't done it before and can do it well. A set of 10 is already more than most people are willing to take to (near) failure.

Edit: just noticed that I misread the leg day exercise selection and that you didn't include squats in your program. So you can ignore the squat-part of the feedback

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nice write-up, agree with pretty much all of what you wrote.

The initial squad planning built depth towards a 4-2-3-1. Ancelotti, ever the pragmatist, the ultimate company man, adapted. He shifted towards a 4-2-3-1,

This part seems a bit confusing though. He shifted towards the formation that was initially planned? You don't give any context to what he shifted from, if it isn't a typo in the formation.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but he preferred Madrid

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 1 points 1 week ago

Last of the top 4 leagues where the title is still contested

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 1 points 2 weeks ago

Goal got disallowed for handball, but the other handball wasn't a penalty??

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 3 points 2 weeks ago

Got to the game late when it was already 0-2 to Real Madrid. Still knew we'd come back lmao

 
 
 
 

Transgender women are to be banned from playing women’s football in Scotland following the Supreme Court ruling on single-sex spaces.

In a move that has piled pressure on the Football Association to act “today” to follow suit, Telegraph Sport has been told the Scottish FA is updating its rules to prohibit those born male from taking part in the female game.

Its English counterpart has been taking legal advice over the implications of this month’s verdict by the UK’s highest court but former FA chair Lord Triesman said similar clarity from the organisation he used to lead was “long overdue” as he accused it of having shown “a foolhardy contempt for law”.

He told Telegraph Sport: “The Scottish FA, often ahead in its thinking, has had the wisdom to ban trans women from women’s football. Similar clarity from the FA is long overdue and the time to act is today. The very idea the FA can disregard the Supreme Court shows a foolhardy contempt for law. Every passing day makes it worse. A decent administrator would devise inclusive competition rules for trans women’s football in minutes; but it would never be as part of women’s football.”

An FA spokeswoman said: “We are carefully reviewing our policy and taking legal advice.”

The SFA has wasted little time acting on the Supreme Court verdict, its board having met on Thursday to discuss imposing a blanket ban on trans women in its female-only competitions.Lawyers are now updating rules that presently allow those born male to play in their affirmed gender category on a case-by-case basis, with testosterone levels taken into account. Trans women will still be able to play in the Scottish Unity Football League – teams from which have a commitment to being open to all – or in men’s football if they choose to do so.

Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns at human rights charity Sex Matters, said: “The SFA has done the right thing, protecting the women’s category before more damage is done. The FA and Welsh FA need to follow its lead now, because every male player in a women’s league affects dozens of women, creating unfairness and increasing the risk of injuries in every match they play.

“The FA policy of requiring trans-identifying male players to lower their testosterone only proves it knows who the men are and that they have male advantage. The longer it delays, the more women are at risk. Men need to accept non-conforming men in their teams. It’s not up to women to be kind at their own expense.”

Telegraph Sport has been told there are currently no registered trans players in Scottish football, although goalkeeper Blair Hamilton played there before moving south of the border.

It emerged on Monday that the FA and England and Wales Cricket Board had both been receiving fresh counsel on transgender policies which had already been updated in recent months.

A blanket ban across sport on trans women in women’s competition appears more likely than ever, with snooker chiefs also announcing a review.

The responses follow campaigners describing a legal ruling two weeks ago that trans women are not women as a watershed moment for sport. Governing bodies could no longer justify allowing male-born athletes to compete against women at any level, they said.

Before the Supreme Court clarification, the FA effectively launched a case-by-case policy at the start of April which stopped short of a blanket ban. About 20 trans women registered to play amateur football in England alongside women could continue playing if their testosterone levels were below five nanomoles per litre for at least 12 months. Those FA rules state: “Where there is an issue about a player’s eligibility, efforts will always be made to resolve it through dialogue between the player, the county FA and the FA.”

Cricket, meanwhile, had already banned trans women who have gone through male puberty from elite matches. However, trans women are eligible to play in tier three of the domestic structure, which comprises traditionally lower-level counties, and in recreational cricket. The ECB previously required all trans women looking to take part in elite-level female-only competitions to apply for written clearance. Evidence was then reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

A source with understanding of the FA’s position said the governing body had now noted the Supreme Court decision and was “taking legal advice on the impact” of its recently amended transgender policy.

Senior figures in cricket, meanwhile, said the legal advice would be an attempt to “fully understand the implications of the ruling and how it might affect recreational cricket”.

The World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association confirmed on Monday that own its policy would be reviewed after clarifications on the meaning of the Equality Act.

Snooker currently allows trans women to compete in its female category if they can demonstrate their testosterone has been below 10 nanomoles per litre for at least 12 months, and then maintain it below that level. Pool had already changed its trans inclusion policy last week following receipt of a report which concluded it was a gender-affected sport.

The 88-page Supreme Court ruling included a section devoted to the interpretation of Section 195 of the Equality Act, which provides an exemption allowing competitors to be excluded from a “gender-affected” sport or activity based on their sex.

The ruling states: “We consider that this provision (Section 195) is, again, plainly predicated on biological sex, and may be unworkable if a certificated sex interpretation is required.”

Lord Triesman immediately responded to the clarification by calling for the heads of sport governing bodies to resign.

“All those involved should stand down immediately from sports administration and from the quasi-judicial panels on which they’ve served and, in effect, broke the law,” he told Telegraph Sport on April 16. “Thank goodness for the wisdom of the most senior judges in the UK.”

Triesman, former Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies and the campaign group Sex Matters confirmed that the ruling had opened the door to football and cricket authorities facing eventual lawsuits from women athletes.

 

It will be their away kit, the home kit will stay yellow.

 
9
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by UndercoverUlrikHD to c/[email protected]
 

Thuram won't be available for the first leg of the semi-finals against Barcelona.

view more: ‹ prev next ›