both works. Just do not forgot to assign fake serial numbers if you are passing disks. IMHO passing disk will be more performant, or may be just pass HBA controller if other disks are on different controller.
TheHolm
joined 1 year ago
Look how much any maintenance/repairs costs now. It may be true.
ZFS or BTRF mirror will know which side is at fault due to checksums. I'm more concern about simultaneous falures of two disks. Rebuilding of a RAID puts lots of pressure on remaining disks, so probability that remaining one dies too is much higher. with RAID6 3 disks need to die to lost date, which is less likely but not impossible.
I would not trust these kind of dives in the mirror. IMHO RAID6 is the only way.
Yeh, just push all costs of using "classic" green generation to existing generation and for sure it will came cheapest. add transmission, over-provioning, and storage cost to it and picture is not that rosy. Go and find that that report, it is just bit of shit.
LE only certify your domain name, you may want to put more (like company name) to cert and it is where classic certs providers come to help.
Why it should be there? I guess at this time no one give a f%&k about someones sexual orientation in Australia. And I fail to see any reason to register it for healthcare/taxation or similar purpose. IMHO questions of nationality should go away too.
Than stop voting for the bastards.
ZFS ZIL will not help in this case.
Usually it can be solved by talking to hotel stuff. you are paying for that service and can expect it be suitable for any legal use.
trouts are for Englishman. Aussie prefer whales.
Biggest problem will be BW and latency to your lab from the Internet. I would use dedicated hardware and subnet for it. Security wise, if you can make your site 100% static it will help a lot with security. I'm personally set on AWS S3 + CloudFlare combo with static site generator running in my lab. Yes it is not really "self hosted" but worries free solution for me.