SpookyBogMonster

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly. While certain dietary habits will most certainly have to shift if we're to adequately tackle climate change, the framing of this as "everyone should just go vegan" falsely puts the onus on individual consumers to solve what is ultimately a systemic problem of production.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

And Hitler was a Vegetarian. Does that mean vegitarians should simp for Hitler because "he had at least one good idea?" I should hope not! Furthermore if they do, even if they only simped for his vegetarianism and not his "political career," it is gonna come off a bit different than they intend to most people.

Hitler being a vegetarian had nothing to do with his fascism. Mao's Epistemology was built on Stalin's synthesizing of Marxism-Leninism from the works of Lenin and the experiences of the Russian Civil War, etc.

There's actual political philosophy here that we can think through, debate, apply, update, and revise. Mistakes or outright malicious behavior can be learned from or discarded as necessary, because Marxism has within it mechanisms for self criticism and recitification.

You can ascribe to that philosophy or not, I don't care. But this kind of kneejerk reaction isn't in line with the way these discussions actually happen within Marxism.

Do dogmatic Marxists who blindly defend bad shit exist? Yes. But they're commonly denounced and criticized for their garbage analysis.

You're taking a small subset of, mostly online weirdos, and stawmanning my position, and an entire branch of political philosophy.

By all means, keep those subs dedicated to defending all those atrocities and simping for despots, but people likely won't be fooled into thinking they only care about epistemology while they say nothing happened in Tienanman Square without a shred of irony

Buddy, I'm not trying to pull wool over your eyes or be sneaky. I literally said to not do this shit. I'm trying to get people to engage with these topics with nuance and critical thinking skills. Not blindly screech uniformed praise or condemnation based on kneejerk, emotional, preconceptions.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Mao and Stalin (though to a noticably lesser extent) actually had insightful things to say though. Mao's essays on epistemology are genuinely really fantastic. And that can be true alongside all of the show trials and sparrow murder which was genuinely really fucking bad.

Pol Pot meanwhile admitted to never having really ever read Marx, and his faction of the Communist Party of Cambodia was more concerned about Khmer ultranationalism and anti-Vietmamese sentiment that had been brewing over the course of French colonialism, then with anything to do with building socialism.

So, I guess what I'm saying is that we ought to take a nuanced, grounded view of historic socialisms that accounts for their success and failures, and doesn't fall into either mindless exoneration of awful shit, nor reflexively screeching "TANKIE TANKIE!!!" Every time anything vaguely socialist oriented comes up in discussion.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

They do that because of Firefox goes, Google is open to being trust busted. Killing Firefox would be literal suicide for Google

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

It got France to this point (descent into authoritarianism), and you think that's a good thing?

..... Do you know what the French historically do to authoritarians???

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I dunno if you know literally anything about the French, but Rioting is a long-standing part of their political culture over there. I'd argue it's a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hello fellow posters

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Not really. It's a separate, temporary, register until a more permanent solution can be found, which given the way Nepalese politics has been since the overthrow of the monarchy in 2006, this is how everything has worked. Constant gridlock has created perpetually delayed "permanent solutions" for damn near everything. So this isn't any different in that respect.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What's considered South Asia is basically the Indian subcontinent. So India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, The Maldives, and sometimes Afghanistan depending on who you ask.

The Himalayas separate South Asia from what's broadly considered East Asia, which is what Taiwan is a part of, given its historic ties to China.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

KRUSTY KRAB IS UNFAIR! MR. KRABS IS IN THERE! STANDING AT THE CONCESSION! PLOTTING HIS OPPRESSION!

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Relevant Tumblr post

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

or new socialist movements in America or Africa for instance

Out of curiosity, what new Socialist movements should we be paying attention to, in your opinion?

view more: ‹ prev next ›