Shitgenstein1

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

tap a well dry as ye may, I guess

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

Before we accidentally make an AI capable of posing existential risk to human being safety

It's cool to know that this isn't a real concern and therefore in a clear vantage of how all the downstream anxiety is really a piranha pool of grifts for venture bucks and ad clicks.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago (17 children)

A year and two and a half months since his Time magazine doomer article.

No shut downs of large AI training - in fact only expanded. No ceiling on compute power. No multinational agreements to regulate GPU clusters or first strike rogue datacenters.

Just another note in a panic that accomplished nothing.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

also

sexy(feminine sexy)

Really feels like he wants to say something but too scared to commit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

genital inspectors, but Rationally tee em

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

I mean, I agree with the sentiment behind the sarcasm, but also feel the same way about the internet in general. Sometimes it's learning the same lesson in a new context. But Roko's basilisk though? Quite a cliff.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Bro believed the Nvidia hype and came out as a doomer lmao.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

truly envy your ignorance on this individual

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

it's a movie about (only in part but imo motivated by) Spike Jonze's break up with Sofia Coppola. It's neither positive or negative about AI per se. AI is a narrative vehicle for the sense of falling in love, growing apart, being left behind, and the aftermath of that break up. At the end, the AI lovingly says goodbye and leaves humanity behind.

view more: ‹ prev next ›