Phileosopher

joined 1 year ago
[–] Phileosopher 2 points 1 year ago

They might flee into the rest of the world and learn social skills. The horror!

[–] Phileosopher 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That depends where you stand. CO2 means more flora, as any 5th-grade biology teacher will tell you.

The real place to look for climate change is water movement: rainfall, sea levels, ocean temperature, river levels, humidity, etc.

And, there are redundancies built into the system, such as radiation-consuming and hydrocarbon-consuming bacteria that thrive well and balance out our "destruction".

[–] Phileosopher 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, you get the idea. Things can be always true, but also where we see them wrong. The Sheep in the Field thought experiment shows it clearly.

[–] Phileosopher 6 points 1 year ago

This will be funny how bad it'll go. I expect ridiculous blocking coming.

Then come the AI bots who comment...

[–] Phileosopher 42 points 1 year ago

This plays out like things I've seen in real life:

  1. Get a community/club/church/workplace going with a good set of leaders.
  2. The system becomes unwieldy through bureaucracy, excessive rules, whatever.
  3. Leadership can't change it, so they storm off in a huff after nobody listens to them.
  4. Power-mongering Assistant to the Regional Manager takes their shot to run the show.
  5. Everything becomes awful.
[–] Phileosopher 16 points 1 year ago (10 children)

In all fairness, that's how Twitter did things from what I can understand.

Of course, that can be quite the payroll expense, especially with a weird model with a panoply of interest-based domains.

I'm sure the Reddit employees will be up to it and has all the equipment necessary for it. That protest was about the amazing internal tooling the mods loved using, right?

[–] Phileosopher 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the emergence of a new community. When things get big, people feel less individually responsible, and that's how trouble starts.

[–] Phileosopher 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That really depends on which philosophy you subscribe to.

The TL;DR is that existential and post-modern philosophy say it's varying degrees of relative, while everything anyone said before ~1800 was saying that facts were immutable.

One fact I can glean is that the data itself may be real (e.g., the wavelengths of light that hit your eyeballs) but the perception is a composite illusion of our mind (e.g., the fact that you just saw a kitty).

[–] Phileosopher 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're forgetting the future stages:

  • holy crap! im autistic
  • hey everyone, im autistic
  • okay, i guess it just explains everything
  • nobody seems to care that much
  • alright, i'll go find a good-paying tech/accounting/science job now
  • proud to be ASD, if anyone cares
[–] Phileosopher 9 points 1 year ago

You'll always have to rely on someone else, unless you build the thing yourself.

The beauty of the fediverse concept is that it's about as easy as possible to build it yourself.

The cost of running a host is a matter of economical management:

  • It costs almost nil to run text-based content.
  • Images take a bit of memory and bandwidth, but are even manageable with an old cellphone under a set number of users.
  • Videos are a major drag, and very expensive unless you're embedding them.

Most open-source is funded as passion projects by devoted geeks who typically already make a living doing other computer things anyway, and fediverse is a bit of the same.

view more: ‹ prev next ›