Olissipo

joined 2 years ago
[–] Olissipo 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] Olissipo 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I don't know if we're discussing semantics. A performance score is attributed, and before the fix their scores were all 166. It doesn't work, as you said. So the consequence is the preferred core being "random", isn't it?

[–] Olissipo 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Apparently there's a bug in an AMD's driver. It was supposed to assign processes based on each core's self reported performance, but because of the bug it was random.

This "self reported performance" is based on evaluation done to the cores in the fab process, by AMD. Meaning, due to imperfections some cores are a bit better than others.

view more: ‹ prev next ›