OccamsRazer

You literally made no effort to understand my comment.

I don't believe in putting the worst possible spin and interpretation on one person or party and giving the other a complete pass. I was hoping for an objective assessment of conservatives motives and beliefs, but it was pretty much the same old "conservatives are racist". Trying to distill it down to racism is ignorant at best, but is more likely just another opinion piece with an agenda. Is Trump tapping into nationalist tendencies? Well yeah, but that's not what characterizes conservatives in general, and it's not racist in and of itself. Nationalism isn't necessarily racist (though it can be, and to some it is), specifically it's pride in what the nation stands for and what is required to maintain the nation the way it is. Or at least the essence that makes the nation. Again, to some this has racism at its roots, but to most (in my experience), it's about ideals and values that are irrelevant of race. What do you think are the core differences between progressives and conservatives? What is the true, fundamental difference in world view between one who is conservative and one who is progressive?

Are you saying that there is no opinion in that article? That it's all facts?

No it's just that it's written for a much smaller audience than I thought it was going to be. The article is fine and seems to accurately depict the position and perspective of people who don't like Trump or conservatives.

It's just that I thought it was supposed to be objective and a fair representation of different perspectives, and it clearly isn't.

Based on op comment, I thought it was going to be an objective assessment of different views and perspectives, but it obviously isn't. Maybe that was my bad assumption.

No need to be pedantic. My point is that the author clearly likes Harris and doesn't like Trump. The author does a good job illustrating the perspective of people who like Harris and don't like Trump. But someone who likes Trump and doesn't like Harris would say that the author doesn't know what he is talking about.

Well, it's very accurate from one perspective anyway. The author is obviously a Democrat/progressive.