Worse than that, smart melee strikers are spending actions to get into and then back out of range, or into range and raising a shield, or doing some kind of proactive defense.
That melee strike should cost 3 actions.
Kichae
joined 1 year ago
To paraphrase Thurston Hillman, GM of Rotgrind and Associate Publisher at Paizo:
If your party needs to do their daily preparations, but it doesn't make sense narrarively for them to take a 9+ hour break, let them refresh their abilities anyway!
The cops would rather patrol the rich gated neighbourhoods looking to harass people who look out of place than deal with my city’s severe drug problems and constant arson and theft.
I mean, that's what they exist for. The idea that they're here to protect the public in any way is just PR spin. They're just state funded security guards for the rich who occasionally do charity work for the rest of us when there's a chance they might get labelled a 'hero'.
YouTube has been an alt-right pipeline for a very long time now. If you so much as smell right-leaning content in the next room, it wilk start serving you truck loads of right wing and alt-right recommendations.
FWIW, it's not a starter set, it's a playtest. It's stress testing things, and leaning on Pathfinder assets. You're not missing out on the full meal deal right now.
LO is Lost Omens, which is the Pathfinder setting.
Things didn't go right this session, but with some new players...
I don't know, this is starting to sound like a separate discussion with separate issues, and as a result it feels like goalpost moving.
The issue with women's fantasy armour has long been that it exists for the Male Gaze, as a trope that is propagated by men for the purpose of titilizing men. It's objectifying the female form, and doing so in a way that does not include women in the discussion at all.
The second image, instead of being a continuation of that, just feels like fashion, and complaints about it land as "no one has ever cared about aesthetics in a suit of armour" which is a totally false take and indefensible platform.
Unfortunatey, it's very difficult to actually decide what an election will be based on. You usually try and figure that out by polling the electorate and framing your election campaign in its terms, in a form of political judo.
This is going to be a cost-of-living election. Milhouse is just trying to turn that into an anti-tax thing.
If there's that much of an issue, then rail employers should actually acknowledge the power of the union, negotiate, and fucking deal. The state stepping in to kill collective action here, because it might affect people over there is done not to protect the people over there, but to ensure they don't get any ideas of their own.
But with the US electing swinging to what we laughably refer to as the left, I wonder if it could cause the CPC trouble in the upcoming election.
No. We lag behind the US's shifts here, which is why it's important to PP to get the election rolling before the year is out. While he'd still probably win an election next year, in all likelihood it would be a much smaller victory should the Yankees actually send any kind of message rebuking the naked fascists running this year.
Over on the 2e subreddit, u/EzekieruYT let everyone know that they'd stumbled across a pre-launch Kickstarter project called Pathfinder: Dragon's Demand. Speculation swirled for a bit before former Paizo Marketing Director Aaron Shanks chimed in to quietly announce the title, and confirm that it's being built on the 2e ruleset.
No details have been announced yet, and the studio behind it doesn't have a deep catalogue, so who knows what it'll actually look like in the end. People are getting hyped for PaizoCon, though.
view more: next ›
Dragon's Demand is a 1E adventure module, so it is a licensed game. The game itself features a bunch of the Pathfinder Iconics.