FlappyBubble

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why? Wireguard i a great protocol and Mullvad best in class with regards to privacy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Debian-based custom built thing. Nothing special.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I have no such advice. I use a Linux basedd NAS myself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

What are those categories/apps?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Seems you also use a bit of freeBSD in your setup besides Linux. Still FOSS though!

 

I'm on Android and use automatic backups. At the moment it runs daily starting at night. I use syncthing to sync the backups to my NAS. It works well.

Since my chat history almost weigh in at 10 GB I'd like to decrease the frequency to lessen the burden on the NAND in my phone.

Is it possible to automatically make backups less often than daily?

34
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Are there any good alternatives tl the HoloISO for non Steamdeck hardware? I'm looking for an alternative due to the main developer is a supporter of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (https://web.archive.org/web/20221117041701/https://steamdeck.community/threads/the-developer-of-holoiso-is-supporting-russian-war-against-ukraine.332/).

 

The Internet was concieved decades ago. In hindsight, many bad design choices were made. Given what was known at the time it's still blows my mind how well it has aged. There are some

Hypothetical scenario: what design choices would we change security wise if we had the opportunity to redesign the Internet from scratch today? Or to tackle the problem the other way around: what are the bad design choices for Internet security that we are stuck with today, unfixible without starting over?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

The problem with incorrect transceiption exists with my secretary too. In the system I work in the secretary write my recordibg, sends it to me, I read it. I can edit the text at this point and then digitally sign it with a personal private key. This usually happens at least a day after being recorded. All perscriptions or orders to my nurses are given inannother system besides the raw text in the medical records. I can't easily explain the practical workings but I really don't see that the AI system will introduce more errors.

But I agree that in the event of a system failure, there will be a catastrophic situation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ah sorry, I mean removing the option of using the keyboard as an input method in the medical records system. The keyboard itself isn't physically removed from the computer clients.

But I agree that in the event of a system failure the hospital will halt.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Unfortunately the interface of the medical records system will be changed when this is implemented. The keyboard input method will be entirely removed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Thats another issue and doesn't lessen the importance of this issue. Both are important but separate. One is about patiwnt data, the other about my voice model. Also in thsi case I have no control over the mesical records and it's already stored outside the hospital in my case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Sure that's another problem but this data is already sent beyond the hospital. We have a national system in place gatjering all medical records.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

My biometric data, in this case my voice. Training an AI, tailored to my voice, out of my control, hosted as a cloud solution.

Of course there is an aspect of patient confidenciality too, but this battle is already lost. The data in the medical records is already hosted outside of my hospital.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I take this as humour - I understand my situation and IT suite isn't more insecure than many others :)

 

As a medical doctor I extensively use digital voice recorders to document my work. My secretary does the transcription. As a cost saving measure the process is soon intended to be replaced by AI-powered transcription, trained on each doctor's voice. As I understand it the model created is not being stored locally and I have no control over it what so ever.

I see many dangers as the data model is trained on biometric data and possibly could be used to recreate my voice. Of course I understand that there probably are other recordings on the Internet of me, enough to recreate my voice, but that's beside the point. Also the question is about educating them, not a legal one.

How do I present my case? I'm not willing to use a non local AI transcribing my voice. I don't want to be percieved as a paranoid nut case. Preferravly I want my bosses and collegues to understand the privacy concerns and dangers of using a "cloud sollution". Unfortunately thay are totally ignorant to the field of technology and the explanation/examples need to translate to the lay person.

view more: next ›