DaughterOfMars

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is really cool! But -- and I mean no disrespect -- it's not really Tarot (or at least not the Major Arcana). Tarot is about symbology, whereas these cards are akin to the Minor Arcana royalty -- Page, Knight, Queen, and King. The art of the Major Arcana is specifically designed to contain certain symbols which can be used for readings. Of course, there are plenty of decks out there that do not conform to this, but they aren't particularly useful as Tarot. It would be really cool to recreate this symbology as Major Arcana cards in the context in Elden Ring though!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can we please get rid of these people who insist on remaining uninformed and then going out and spreading their ignorance by attacking others? It's contrary to the vision of this instance to allow them to continue this behavior.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Oh fuck yes!!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In some sense the ends justify the means here, I think. There was no way of really knowing when they created this process whether it would work, but here we are. It seems to me the community is quite tolerant and generally on the same page, so I would say it works well enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A long video -- probably much longer than it needed to be to make its point -- but a good one. It's hard to express why you might start to dislike a show like Sunny, and she does a good job of outlining the reasons with evidence to back it up.

As someone who doesn't think about shows in a meta-sense too often, a lot of the issues with Mac's character really did go over my head. In fact, I had kind of tricked myself into thinking Gay Mac was a better character because I identify with him more than old Mac, but as Mary rightly points out the purpose of the characterization in the show is to make fun of them, not to identify with them. Mac being openly gay necessitates that the show make fun of gay culture, and that's pretty antithetical to its thesis.

The gross-out humor also kind of slipped past me, but in hindsight it's obviously a crutch that they've been relying on in a lot of the later episodes (and continue to, see S16E1 and E3...).

And I definitely noticed how characters were wildly shifting between their traits and the "straight-man" on an episode-by-episode basis, though I didn't realize how much it's just a later-season problem. It's a little heartbreaking because it definitely feels like the cast just doesn't care enough to try anymore, and are only making the show still for their paychecks, which indicates that there's very little chance of a "turnabout" or return-to-form like Mary suggests.

On the bright side, we got between 8 and 12 really damn good seasons, and nobody can take that away.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, gorgeous!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oh man this takes me back.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

At least for now always sorting by new is very pleasant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is a somewhat reductive statement, I'll give you that, but I think the core idea is true. Most people will go to the easiest solution. Lemmy's userbase may continue to grow for some time, but it will not reach anywhere close to the level of reddit. I think it's foolish to point to the trends from the last week and try to draw conclusions about the future, as this is clearly an extraordinary circumstance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you really think the average person knows or cares about that? No, of course not. They will congregate on the most populous instance so long as it continues to support the traffic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was a lot of chaos around the migration, no surprises there. We can't change the past, but we can set goals to make the future better.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You're pointing out the exact problem that I am describing: Users will naturally flock to the largest, most stable instances, thus centralizing lemmy and removing the benefit of federation.

229
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

In my opinion, there are two big things holding Lemmy back right now:

  1. Lemmy needs DIDs.

    No, not dissociative identity disorder, Decentralized Identities.

    The problem is that signing up on one instance locks you to that instance. If the instance goes down, so does all of your data, history, settings, etc. Sure, you can create multiple accounts, but then it's up to you to create secure, unique passwords for each and manage syncing between them. Nobody will do this for more than two instances.

    Without this, people will be less willing to sign up for instances that they perceive "might not make it", and flock for the biggest ones, thus removing the benefits of federation.

    This is especially bad for moderators. Currently, external communities that exist locally on defederated instances cannot be moderated by the home-instance accounts. This isn't a problem of moderation tooling, but it can be (mostly*) solved by having a single identity that can be used on any instance.

    *Banning the account could create the same issue.

  2. Communities need to federate too.

    Just as instances can share their posts in one page, communities should be able to federate with other, similar communities. This would help to solve the problem of fragmentation and better unify the instances.

Obviously there are plenty of bugs and QoL features that could dramatically improve the usage of Lemmy, but these two things are critical to unification across decentralized services.

What do you think?

EDIT: There's been a lot (much more than I expected) of good discussion here, so thank you all for providing your opinions.

It was pointed out that there are github issues #1 and #2 addressing these points already, so I wanted to put that in the main post.

view more: next ›