I never use models trained on specific people or ask for celebs in my prompts. This is the base Flux model plus a Gil Elvgren style model. I can see the resemblance though, but it wasn't something I was aiming for.
Why not both? 🤷
I think some of both. I gravitate towards the more fashion photography models/loras first, rather than start with the porn models. I also prompt for an assortment of expressions and nationalities, and I do go into detail on the hair length/color/style, and I think that does a lot for generating a wide variety of faces.
Some of that is also basic curation. I generate a ton of images, then look at it as a photography shoot, and select the ones that grab my attention more.
Yeah, Flux is amazing with hands. I still get a few gnarled fingers and toes (I did get one gal with foot hands that was disturbing), but on the whole, it's worlds better than the Stable Diffusion models.
These look like modern day Art Frahm pinups. Digging the oil paint aesthetic!
Lookin good! I was just perusing the metadata and got a chuckle out of "wearing a light grey shaved smooth vagina."
Wildcards and dynamic prompts are a killer feature for getting diversity. You can have ChatGPT output long lists of options and save them as text to pull from, rather than putting the OR options in the prompt. For instance, here's just a snippet of my 100 line "hair_color_natural_hightlights.txt" wildcard file:
chestnut brown with sun-kissed golden highlights
dark blonde with naturally blended caramel highlights
auburn with subtle coppery undertones and honey highlights
jet black with hints of espresso brown and warm burgundy highlights
chocolate brown with natural honey and toffee highlights
ash brown with delicate pearl-toned highlights
light brown with sunlit blonde highlights
One question though, are you sure you have the dynamic prompts extension enabled in A111? These all look very similar, and the fact that the OR statement is in the prompt metadata still makes me wonder. Typically, the "brunette | ginger | blonde" would get resolved by the dynamic prompt processor before generation, and the image metadata would only show the single selected term by itself.
Lol! Yeah, this workflow idea was one of the main reasons i'm making the transition.
These are very sweet, and love the embroidery details!
All of the SDXL models are too airbrushy plastic to my eye, but you can't argue with the hand quality over the older 1.5 models. One of the things I'm wanting to try is to start with an XL model to get the basic pose structure in place, then finish with the grittier and more realistic 1.5 models. That introduces a whole new level of adjustment knobs to play with!
Lol! I promise this is a one-time thing. 🤡
view more: next ›
After a careful review, I believe you are correct. I'll take the matter up with the clothier.