CapeWearingAeroplane

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly, I kind of wish crypto hadn't gone to shit with the whole speculation thing.. It was just this fun thing where obscure websites would let you buy random shit for laughs sometimes. Then suddenly investors had to try making money off something with no inherent value and ruined it :/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

GET THE ROUNDIE!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

On a hard drive? I remember a bunch of people messing around with bitcoin when it was new, relatively unknown and considered a niche nerd thing. There were online competitions with money prizes where the "last winner" (eg. third place) would win like one bitcoin.

Fast forward 15 years and the stuff you mined for fun in high school and forgot about on some dusty old computer is worth thousands of dollars.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It's completely common in most countries that some high-ranking government officials live on state-owned property. Among the reasons for this are security, and the fact that official visits, press events and other official events are held at that property.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My personal tale on this is that given that the brain contains chaotic circuits (i.e. circuits in which tiny perturbations lead to cascading effects), and these circuits are complex and sensitive enough, the brain may be inherently unpredictable due to quantum fluctuations causing non-negligible macroscopic effects.

I don't know if the above is the case, but if there's anything like free will out there, I'm inclined to believe that its origins lie in something like that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I'm perplexed: How do you go from someone saying "gender is a social construct" to them being trasphobic? I got the "spot the vegan" vibes that they were trying to suddenly make this about trans rights..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love pedantry <3 I got the "three medals per event" from some Wikipedia page, and I know they love pedantry over there as well, so maybe you should make a contribution?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

We have divided a bunch of sports into "open class" and "women only" (some sports use "men only" and "women only") because the difference between men and women is large enough that

  1. Women would be unable to compete at a professional level otherwise

  2. A lot of sports would be directly dangerous for women (see: contact sports without weight classes)

Nobody argues that it's pointless to have weight classes. How is that different from having classes based on (a proxy for) levels of testosterone?

One of the best male 1500m runners today, Jacob Ingebritsen, beat the current women's WR by almost 4 seconds when he was 15 years old. Women can be amazing athletes, and watching women compete at the top level is amazing. That's why we need a class where they can compete, just like we need weight classes in many sports.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

In 2020 there were 448 events at the Olympics, let's round up to 450. Each event gives 3 medals, for a total of 1350 medals. The Olympics are held every four years, so that 337.5 medals are awarded in an average year.

There are about 8.1 billion people in the world. On average, 0.000004 % of the worlds population receives an Olympic medal each year.

If this were a completely random yearly lottery, and you lived for 100 years, you would have about a 0.0004 % chance of winning an Olympic medal in your lifetime.

I would count myself lucky if I won that by the time I was 50.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well I guess that still has the same effect of removing anonymity, but if it gets more people voting it's still a net positive. To my knowledge the US has a concerningly low turnout rate for elections, so anything that helps...

I guess what I'm most concerned about is a situation where people are forced to vote for a specific candidate, and it doesn't really seem to me like there's any mechanism in place to prevent that (?)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

I wasn't implying anything here, no need to be a dick about it. Like I said: I'm my country we don't have this system.

The kind of possibilities I was thinking about were more along the lines of an abusive spouse forcing their partner to sign a ballot, someone stealing a neighbours ballot out of their mailbox and forging their signature, or some family member doing the same to other family members.

Signatures can be forged quite easily if you have access to other signatures from that person, so I was honestly wondering what kind of system they have in place to ensure the kind of things mentioned above don't happen.

Also, I guess I was kind of assuming ballots weren't signed, in order to protect the anonymity of the voters, and that there was some more sophisticated system in place.

 

Jeg skal ikke dømme noen for det de stemmer, spesielt i et lokalvalg hvor jeg vet at partiene lokalt ikke nødvendigvis er representative for partiene nasjonalt. Men det noe som oppriktig forundrer meg når jeg ser valgresultatet: I noen kommuner er det over 40 % av velgerne som stemmer på FRP. Jeg lurer veldig på hva det er som trekker så mange velgere til FRP i de kommunene? Hvilke saker er det? Det er stort sett kommuner som ikke ser så mye til innvandring, lavere skatt er en sak Høyre også pleier å trekke velgere på, og utbygging av vei / bilpolitikk pleier SP å trekke velgere på. Hvorfor velger så enormt mange å stemme FRP noen steder?

 

I have some military-grade gear from my time in the army that would be useful for anyone sitting in cold, wet conditions, and that has to move a lot. For example a soldier. Can anyone here give me an indication as to how it is best to send it, and what is needed most? How can I ensure that it gets to the people that need it?

view more: next ›