Nah, Trump being NATO leader would have just shifted the burden more towards Europe than it already was. Making useless grandstanding arguments against Donald Trump was like, every EU leaders favorite action during his presidency.
CTHlurker
joined 4 years ago
I do whenever my annoying coworker begins complaining about "the woke", just as my way of fucking with him.
If there is a vegan accelerationism, who is Vegan Posadas, and how does he think communism will be achieved?
Whenever I occassaionally try to remove some of the brainworms of the people around me, whenver they talk about "stalin and hitler being the same", i mention the fact that if Stalin had been as brutal/genocidal as Hitler had, there would have been no Germans left in any of the Soviet occupied territories. Nazi Germany killed more than 20 million civillians, and if Stalin had actually sought revenge there would not have been anything left of Germany east of the occupation line.
My dreamjob is now to become the fucking "defense correspondant" for Danish Government Media. That motherfucker has been wrong about EVERYTHING and somehow I'm still supposed to believe that he knows what he is talking about, as if he shouldn't have been thrown out on the street the milli-second it became clear to him that the Storm Shadow missiles, the HIMARS systems, the F-16s, the Leopards and every other fucking WunderWaffen weren't going to cause the Russian state to collapse like the Soviet Union in the 90s.
I always just thought that "expat" meant a person dispatched by a company or organization to do work in another country and with an expectation that the worker in question moves back to their country of origin when their contract is over. Whereas an immigrant tends to be a person who moves permanently / with an idea to settle in another country. Though i will agree with the other commenters here that my definition of "expat" is essentially a whites-only word for "migrant worker".
The CIA (and Mossad and other intelligence agencies with a long history of wetwork) are not dangerous because they are puppet-masters secretly controlling everything, but because they are allowed to do whatever they want and with almost an infinite budget. I think in general people on the left tend to overestimate the intelligence community's skillset, which leads to them making the wrong conclusions. Obviously I'm not saying that these freaks aren't extremely dangerous, but they aren't omnipotent.
Does this guy think the Great Famine happened because there weren't any landlords? I would love to hear him explain how those two thoughts are connected in his peanut-shaped skull
Heavily armed (for a civilian population not involved in a civil war), incredibly stupid and extremely angry about their collapsing standards of living.
Who was the poster on here that said "Britain will not have a century of humiliation before Dover is a treaty port and leased to a foreign government." Seems like they are gonna get their wish, and this time, the foreign power might actually be welcomed as a liberator 
Senator Bloodfeast is a valuable and honorable member of the Foreign Relations Committee.
That would unironically probably make me vote for Mette Frederiksen / the SuccDems in the next election.