AnonTwo

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

To be fair morale could not have been that high in one of the worst modern wars in world history...least he didn't destroy it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Makes sense. If I recall she's RL friends with Cheri (recent graduate), so she probably wants to do stuff with her.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Advertisers are the best at spreading word.

It's probably why award shows (which are also smothered with ads) get so much publicity.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I don't want bat credit card and ice puns either. It's good for a laugh, but only because of how bad it is.

Just make Batman serious without making him unnecessarily edgy. We don't need to psychoanalyze every little thing interesting about him until it's not interesting anymore, especially not in the first movie. Leave the viewers to fill in some blanks.

The Arkham games were a great example that you can have a serious batman and still have a silly but dangerous Joker. And all they did was ramp up the actually good cartoon series that is still better than the movies.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So...did they investigate uvalde yet or no?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

To be fair, only a handful of publishers were able to take their cards and go elsewhere. The media companies were a lot more on top of dragging their products off of Netflix.

Nobody would be on steam just for Valve games, after all, and indie has a much lower barrier of entry.

While they could certainly distribute their current products better, a lot of the issues they have now (see: belated frogs comment) aren't things they really had control over.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Thanks for the clarification

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Are these cases required to go to a state court before they're presented federally?

While it's good to know, It feels like it's not relevant whether an individual state's courts argue it, since foreign policy has to be handled on a federal level.

edit: I'm actually confused. It's a federal court in California? what sway does it have typically?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

It's probably because I generally saw the sub shutdowns as a result of the protest, and not as an ongoing protest. Reddit clearly wasn't in any talks with the mods at that point and vica versa.

Honestly i'll just go with it being months. I'm basically just arguing semantics at this point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I mean, I remember it being weeks myself.

But it's not as if things went back to the way they were either. There were definitely effects due to those weeks.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

And true to life, once sickness envelops her, HR will kick her to the curb.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It wasn't the right argument is the issue. Like only the last thing he ever said was directly saying CPC.

Like if thats what we wanted to find out we clearly got the wrong person to ask it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›