this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
193 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
735 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"I found it very weird that there essentially is no way to browse the web in an open manner. So that's what I am trying to build," the founder of Stract said.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So have many others, except they didn't start a company based on it. As soon as it is part of a company, it is no longer free and open

[–] [email protected] 60 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.

https://opensource.org/osd/

Paradoxically (or not), restrictions on selling software is a fundamental violation of freedom. When the OSS movement says free, it means freedom as in free to do what you want, not free as in free beer. Of course, that freedom also includes the freedom to give it away.

So in practice, that usually results in exactly what you lament: free software with a business model on top to support its development and pay programmers so they can eat.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago

Why? It depends on the business model, even RMS says it's ok to make money with open source

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What are the actual reasonable outcomes here:

  1. The search engine becomes successful and requires monetization to pay for the hosting/indexing costs
  2. The search engine does not become successful and the ever increasing cost of indexing the entire internet forces monetization or shut down
  3. You self host your own version, in which case you need to start indexing yourself (see problem #2)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think what would be interesting is to get everyone who self hosts this do part of the indexing. As in, find some way to split the indexing over self-hosted instances running this search engine. Then make sure "the internet" is divided somewhat reasonably. Kind of what crypto does, but instead producing the indexes instead of nothing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That would give random strangers (at least partial) control over what is indexed and how and you'd have to trust them all. I'm not sure that's a great idea.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

There areways to get around this. Give every indexing job to multiple nodes, decide the result by majority vote between those nodes and penalize (i.e. exclude) nodes that repeatedly produce results that don’t match the majority. Basically what distributed research has done for decades.

Getting the details of such a system right wouldn’t be easy but far from impossible.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. The creator included the !bang feature. Nice. Gonna have to play with this more.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

yup, every engine that supports !bangs gets my attention immediately.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I should probably know what this does but I'm thinking I don't. Could somebody explain?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

They're ways to search on a specific site from the engine's search bar. For instance, !gsch cows will search for cows on google scholar from DuckDuckGo. I don't know how stamdardized bangs are across engines, but they're super useful if you use a bunch of obscure search tools on the day to day.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how it compares with searxng. I do like that it's written in Rust instead of Python.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's got a fully independent search index according to the README. SearxNG, LibreX, LibreY, etc. just takes results from multiple search engines and combines them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Mh, but there are (were?) other search-engines where you could crawl the web yourself, I relember doing that for the lolz, can't rember the name, though.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

there is a business around it and the project doesn't really have any background so no trust that has built up. I would thread carefully

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Ok, hold on...

Can it be self-hosted?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Looks like it from the readme!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Amazing, will try this out on the Pi then.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

I was wondering the same, but I didn't find any information on how it builds the search index. I guess it takes quite a while until it's usable. Also, it might be very dependent on the speed if the internet connection and also the available storage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

In the github page linked in this post:

We recommend everyone to use the hosted version at stract.com, but you can also follow the steps outlined in CONTRIBUTING.md to setup the engine locally.