this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2023
95 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

34877 readers
49 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/post/11661

With a fresh new start we have the power to enforce some unspoken etiquettes on the site in the hopes of a better platform than Reddit.

One great feature I see no one talking about is that we can write our own text when posting links, which is extremely useful for communities that mostly link articles. A lot of the political and tech related articles are mostly fluff, filled with jargon and clickbait only to have a one line news at the end of it all.

We should try to make it a habit to write the main point(s) that the article is making to avoid misinformation and ragebait titles. Ideally, a post without any text backing the article would become a red flag that it's posted by some bot or mass spammer, and would not be floated to the front page.

Interested to hear what the rest of the Lemmy community thinks!

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even better is to post the text of paywalled articles so people without access can still read them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Nothing more annoying than seeing an article that looks interesting but it's paywalled and there isn't even a summary in the replies.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Interesting thought. I honestly post without my own text on links because I'm hoping to engender conversation, and I always felt that by having my own thoughts tied directly to the link in that way kind of steers discussion. Instead I will post the link alone and then add a comment. I'd love to hear some other perspectives on it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I solve this by just quoting the article at the points that describe/explain why I'm sharing it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah I'd much prefer people do it your way - or just the link is fine if you want to share and don't have a comment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I always liked Metafilter's "Front Page Post" where the text body included many more links and information about the subject. (I have linked here to what I consider a particularly well done example) They often also include links to previous discussions about the same subject.

I think there's some quality writers out there and some people doing really good research (and I'm not just talking about DD in /r/Superstonk), and having additional information is of great service to deeper discussion. Otherwise half of the discussion can be unknowingly a retread of very well-worn ideas. That's less likely to happen the more information is added.

I like the idea of a TL;DR at the beginning of a post, but I also like the idea of additional links and information "below the jump" as the beanplaters at MeFi say. This allows the best of both worlds, a quick rundown as well as more information for those who wish to view it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Down for tl;drs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I remember /r/politics had the tldr bot, would there be anyway to get that going on news heavy communities?

load more comments
view more: next ›