this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
37 points (97.4% liked)

Linguistics

498 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laymen to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

  1. Stay on-topic. Specially for more divisive subjects.
  2. Post sources whenever reasonable to do so.
  3. Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
  4. Have fun!

Related communities:

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Link for the Science research article. The observation that societies without access to softer food kind of avoided labiodentals is old, from 1985, but the research is recent-ish (2019).

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My favourite bit of this is the comment at the bottom of the page that just says "doubt it". So glad scientific discourse is alive and well.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

I'm glad, too. This sort of scepticism is one of the pillars of science. Like, just because it seems solid (it does, for me) it doesn't mean that it's true.

A factor not mentioned by either the research nor the article is that [f v] sound considerably sharper than [ɸ β], so there are contrastive reasons to shift the fricatives from bilabial to labiodental if the effort necessary doesn't make them too convoluted to pronounce.