this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
135 points (93.5% liked)

News

23014 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Customs officials reportedly charge actor €35,000 after alleged failure to declare item intended for climate charity auction

Arnold Schwarzenegger was briefly held by customs officers at Munich airport on Wednesday after allegedly failing to declare a €26,000 (£22,000) Audemars Piguet watch the Terminator star was planning to sell at an auction in aid of his climate crisis charity.

The Austrian-born actor and former governor of California, 76, was stopped at the airport for about three hours upon arrival from Los Angeles, according to the German tabloid Bild, which quoted customs officials.

Schwarzenegger was taken aside by officers who searched his luggage and found the watch, which the actor had allegedly not declared on his arrivals customs form.

A spokesperson for the main customs office in Munich said: “We have initiated criminal tax proceedings. The watch should have been registered because it is an import.” We

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 92 points 10 months ago (3 children)

offered to pay the charge with his credit card, but German customs rules require half of the charge to be paid in cash.

What a stupid fucking law.

He should've had that shit looked at though, especially being a public person.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

requires half to be paid in cash

Tell me you're assisting with corruption without telling me you're assisting with corruption.

There is absolutely no reason to charge half as cash unless you want physical money to conveniently forget to report.

Why do you think so many slightly shady businesses offer cash discounts? If your answer is "only card fees" then you may want to double check that last apple gift card you sent to grandma for her IRS bill actually made it to her.

I don't care if it's John down the street or a major world government. Someone somewhere saw this and thought "ooh, more money we can accidentally misreport"

Sure is a shame that the 17.5k never made it to it's destination. That 15k could have come in handy. You never know when 10k could be useful for stopping terrorists that bring watches into the country. Hard to believe that 5k could be useful, but that 2k is going to be stretched as far as it can go.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

First of, I couldn't find anything to corroborate the ~~experience~~ existence of such a rule.
The article might not be entirely accurate.

But even if it were true, you think customs officials just take your money without giving you a receipt?
And how would underreporting even work if the amount is exactly specified?

"Yes, we fined him for 20k, he paid 10k by card and here are the other 8k in cash."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In the US, the way it works is that the cash part never makes it onto the report, though more commonly this happens when the police do a "no knock raid" on "the wrong house" and then empty the family safe. The contents of the safe simply never get reported as evidence or mysteriously disappear from the evidence room without being reported as missing, like a fairly decent portion of the drugs taken as evidence every year does.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In this hypothetical scenario, if he paid by card you'd already have evidence that he was fined and what 50% of the amount was.
So the customs guys would have to bring in the same amount in cash. How would the cash part not make it into the report if there were a rule that there must be a cash part?

And once that is deposited in the bank, nobody can just walk in and make some of it disappear.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, after making that comment I realized the whole "customs gives you a receipt" thing, whereas the scenario I was talking about basically comes down to your word vs theirs, and what they write in their report. It's a scenario with a lot less accountability than customs has.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

but German customs rules require half of the charge to be paid in cash.

What a stupid fucking law.

Never heard of such a rule.
Afaik the reason why he couldn't pay with card was that the card reader was broken.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I have no idea, I just pulled that out of the article linked in the post.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Cash payment = you're a criminal

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago

Poor guy, he fought so hard to stop the AI only to live long enough to see it's rise anyways.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

Did he learn nothing from Christopher Walken in Pulp Fiction?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I seem to recall high end watches being a way to avoid carrying large amounts of cash across borders. Maybe even for money laundering (although that seems cumbersome).

People can carry tens or hundreds of thousands across borders in their luggage as personal wardrobe accessories. Once they arrive at their destination, find a dealer who will buy a watch for cash and they have loads of local currency without paying bank transaction fees or getting government haircuts.

Not that I think that's what's going on here, but it may be the media shining a spotlight on it for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

It’s better to wear the watch and jewelry if you’re having that intent.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the worst thing that has ever happened at a Munich airport..

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm going to assume you're telling the truth and not look it up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It was a joke. That was an extremely well-known event which Steven Spielberg made a movie about and it was nominated for a bunch of Oscars.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I've never seen the movie. I've only learned about this event today. You learn something new everyday.

Edit: The movie isn't even about the same event. I've learned 2 new things today...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_(2005_film)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

You learned something new too early in the day. Make sure you don't learn anything else.

[–] Tja 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I live like 500 meter from the memorial so I knew about it, and I'm sure it's quite famous in Manchester, but I don't think it's an extremely well known event.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When Steven Spielberg makes a movie about something, I'd say it's pretty well known.

[–] Tja 2 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Now he’s going to be on some kind of watch list!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

That's who we need on Lemmy.

Because Margot Robbie is getting us nowhere.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I'd be more upset if the headline read "Arnold Schwarzenegger commited tax fraud but was let through because he's famous"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It'll be back........

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just have to run to an ATM.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

And buy some firepower.

[–] sleepyTonia -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Is this a German thing? I've traveled many times between Canada and the USA and never had to fill any customs form.
Edit: Boy oh boy. I thought Reddit was the toxic place, but can't ask a damn question in here without getting slammed with downvotes?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Most countries dislike people registered as tourists carrying products intended for commerce. In this instance it was intended for auctioning even with the proceedings going to a charitable org but maybe the German law doesn't make a distinction (it seems an edge case that possibly wouldn't have been codified).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

There's a threshold for declaration at the US-Canada border too. Your odds of getting searched in a car at the canada-us border are low, though.