this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
659 points (100.0% liked)

196

16363 readers
1981 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

technically, they're called the fire brigade, not necessarily the fire prevention brigade

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some of the best fire starters (and unfortunately multiple arsons) I've met were fire fighters

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Met? How do you know so many arsons?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Well, the number I've met who are both is 2. Which is way too many. 3 if you count the guy who caught the local park's amphitheater on fire as well

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe from the interest club?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

c/arsonmeetup

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Gets commented every second time this is posted but:

"Fire doesn't discriminate so we don't either" or something along those lines would've been infinitely better.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's an effective advert if the purpose is to increase awareness of fire safety. We have some awful ones in the UK with partially burnt teddy bears and stuff. I think it's more leveraging popular imagery to deliver that message, rather than expressing LGBT support.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You can see on the right of the image there is another progress flag with text on it. I think it's safe to say this image is framed in a way to eliminate the context.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's cut off where it says almost exactly that on the right

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Less catchy and you'd need smaller letters, tho ...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Heat from fire

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The inevitable heat death of the fire consumes us all

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fun fact: "the heat death of the universe" refers to the death of heat, not death from heat. Heat itself will die. There will be no more warmth in the universe, everything will end in cold and dark and ice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

More that the universe will all be the same temperature, which is, granted, really rather cold.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kinda? All energy will dissipate until everything is the same temperature. Idk what that temperature will be but it might be pretty cold. But heat won’t just, like, go away. It will homogenize.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The concept of heat as we know it will be gone. If there's no differences in temperature then there's no heat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Heat - A form of energy associated with the motion of atoms or molecules

That would still exist. However a “concept” being defined as an idea, would not exist as there would be no living thing to think it up.

So heat would exist, the “concept of heat” wouldn’t. So your first statement is technically correct. Your second statement is wrong by the primary definition of heat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Atoms will fall apart and reach equilibrium too. No more atoms.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Cool. I don’t know if that aligns the the current theory and frankly, don’t care enough to research it.

But that doesn’t disprove my statement. Unless all matter juices itself into energy, heat will exist. heat is a property of matter unless said matter is at -273 C (which seems impossible that that is the temperature for the universe to settle on)

But… I’m not a theoretical physicist and you probably aren’t one either. So we are both out of our depth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I suppose this is technically true. One could light a bigot and a trans person on fire and both would die a relatively equally agonizing death.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Being gay is lit? Got it!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

🤣🤔😬

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Full circle with the bundle of sticks derogatory term

load more comments
view more: next ›