this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
633 points (98.6% liked)

Apple

17530 readers
34 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 184 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Yep. They really doubled down on privacy/security and it’s pretty admirable. The President doesn’t use an android or a blackberry for a reason. (Well, two in the case of blackberry. Security and existing). If only there were no other problematic areas of Apple’s business (manufacturing, wages, environmental impact).

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't wait for them to put their money where their mouth is and do the same in China and other large population countries that demand the same thing 😂

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

They use WeChat anyway.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This is one thing Apple has been pretty firm on. You can’t have a secure product and have backdoors. You can try to hide them all you want, but a backdoor will always be a massive security vulnerability.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Will, except in China. They opened the backdoor nice and wide for Winnie the Pooh so he could gobble up all the Chinese iCloud data

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good on them for standing up for what's right on this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really. Apple's track record for this kind of thing is pretty great. See also, the San Bernardino case.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Apple doesn't like be told what to do.

If privacy is in the way of their desires then Apple will invade their user's privacy. They don't stand for privacy.

[–] cufta22 3 points 1 year ago

Only apple is allowed to spy on it's users

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Seems like you're spewing FUD to me, mostly. I agree Apple is far from perfect, but they literally introduced an e2e methodology for much of iCloud data recently.

Besides, even if they are only doing this out of selfish desire, it's still a good thing for the consumers in this case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Has everyone forgotten about Apples plan to scan every single photo uploaded to iCloud for harmful content? They can and will destroy any semblance of privacy for the right reason.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good, why should they comprise security. It makes it easier for everyone to hack, not just the government

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It could already be completely hackable and no one would know because the security in this case is solely based on apples word with zero auditing. If there were a true financial incentive there is no doubt they would compromise "security".

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

21st century govenrments: Hey guys, why don't we ban math?

Yeah good luck with that. Gotta give it to Apple on this one, though I'm not a huge fan of their business practices otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t doubt it. Apple would probably just ship a new app called “Texts” or something that only does traditional cell carrier text messages, and then refer customers to third party solutions for video conferencing. A nice explanatory web page on Apple’s website to point customers in the region towards would be the cherry on top.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

No need for a new app. The app is already called „messages“. Just remove iMessage support and it works „fine“

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we get iMessage on Android in the States tho?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

We have iMessage at home (it's Signal and nobody else uses it)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they removed the ability to send sms in the app. so I, like many others, moved on to other apps that could handle such a task.

signal isn't capable of anything other than talking to other signal users. so it's a dead app.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Hope this comes to fruition. Maybe it would help people realize how dumb it is to be locked into these services in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

We will have to wait and see what if they actually follow through.

They are big ones for making grand statements and then quietly backtracking later on once all the press isn't paying attention anymore.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'd say good on Apple protecting their users but knowing Apple it's more like they don't want to be told what to do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Mine is mainly a YouTube and Books machine. During the NFL season I’ll use it to keep tabs on games that my team isn’t in, or pull up NFL Redzone as a PiP kind of setup from the couch.

Sometimes I use it for recipes too

load more comments
view more: next ›