this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
166 points (80.7% liked)

News

23014 readers
14 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Police are investigating a virtual sexual assault of a girl's avatar, the chair of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners has said.

Donna Jones said she had learned that a complaint was made in 2023, triggering a police inquiry.

The virtual incident did not result in physical harm but caused "psychological trauma", the Daily Mail has reported a source as saying. Police chiefs have called on platforms to do more to protect their users.

The impact of the attack on the girl's avatar was said to be heightened because of the immersive nature of the VR experience.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 136 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I can't make up my mind on this one. On one hand we probably should make some rules etiquette and laws regarding VR, but on the other hand I made it through the Halo series just fine and was able to separate myself from what those people did to my corpse.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 10 months ago

So...many...teabags

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I would classify this as sexual harassment. It's no different from being sent obscene videos over email. The gravity resides in that they're sexual assault videos with the recipient being the victim.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (15 children)

Having been involved in something that was actually bad, I can say with certainty that there are enough rules already (in most places) that apply to these sorts of situations. Harassment and stalking crimes cover the sorts of things that need to be handled by police. If someone teabags you in Halo, or curses at you or says disgusting things in a voice chat, you either block them or shake your head and move on. If they follow you around through multiple lobbies, send/spam pictures or post/spray real pictures of genitalia (in places where it is not supposed to be, such as your inbox/cellphone/vr lobbies, obviously not talking about nsfw sites), those things are already crimes covered by harassment/stalking/sexting crimes.

There may be a few edge cases where someone can skirt the laws, but again, in my experience, the statutes are broad enough to catch almost everything you could imagine and want to be a crime.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Dip dip potato chip

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (47 children)

It's a little silly at this stage, but I think there needs to be a legal framework around this thing now because eventually, our games will be realistic enough and immersive enough that this could become a serious issue.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're joking right? Read about Ellen Page and the Beyond:Two Souls controversy.

Shit's already here. It's not just a little silly anymore. And with those AI deep fakes floating around, anyone can become a pornstar without even knowing about it.

People already killing themselves for fake rape allegations and social media pariah-ism, what now that fake porn with you in it can be made at any time?

This shit's a disaster in the making, not just a little silly.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This is the best comment in this thread so far. You make some excellent points.

What that girl experienced is definitely a form of harassment. And the VR part just made it more real than simple texts or photos. Which I think should be considered as a form of psychological assault.

And how fucked up must men and rape culture be that a girl can't even feel safe in a fucking virtual reality setting. Seriously, that's a big WTF. This is just sad.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

I'd say it's more expected. People feel fat less social restraints when online. VR is no different.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)
[–] [email protected] 102 points 10 months ago (12 children)

It sounds ridiculous that they assaulted an avatar. I think it is the wrong take. The avatar is just the medium. The target was obviously the person behind the avatar. It's like saying that threats over text message is assaulting her phone.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

Ssssh it's okay iphone. Don't listen to them. I know you were just protecting me from the bullies in high school

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't know how to feel about the headline when I read it, is it possible to do that? I still don't know. It's not really for me to decide how SHE feels either. It just sounds.... Weird? And not possible? I don't know.

Regardless, in my mind, it depends on what the action was. If I send a text to your phone to hack it, then I guess I'm "assaulting your phone" but if the phone is the medium used to get to you then obviously it's towards you.

And this can all be made moot by the software devs with an input box "keep non-friends N meters away". Its all tech and virtual. Whatever she has a problem with can be an option to toggle for her.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Example from the article what it can look like:

Recalling the experience, Ms Patel told the same programme that she was "surrounded by three to four male-sounding and male-representing avatars, who started sexually harassing me in a verbal sense and then sexually assaulting my avatar".

She said they had used misogynistic language and "continued to touch my avatar in a way that can only be described as a sexual assault of my avatar".

So, I guess the appropriate terminology would be sexual harassment of the person by virtual sexual assault on their avatar in the VR space, or something like that.

I can imagine for an innocent person unprepared for it to be ganged and surrounded by deviants in VR sounds like it could be a proper traumatic experience. I don't think there should be downplaying or normalizing this kind of experience for the sole reason that pervs are to be expected online. There is no reason to sink expectations of society to the lowest uncommon deranged denominator.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 96 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Maybe when an article says "The daily mail jas reported" we should completely ignore it until a better paper reports on it. Everything coming from the daily mail should be considered a lie.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

I missed the Daily Mail bit. Thank you for pointing it out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

This is sexual harrassment, not assault. It's still disgusting, but there's no reasonable expectation of harm. They can always take off the headset.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And yet it's completely possible to kill someone with cyber bullying. Trauma is trauma.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Imagine if someone had killed them in a VR game

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 months ago

The amount of murder I have done in gaming. I'm going away for a long time boys💀

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago (9 children)

VR is immersive, but it isn't that immersive, especially when it comes to user feedback

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago (3 children)

[the victim] suffered psychological trauma "similar to that of someone who has been physically raped".

No she didn't. I'm sure it wasn't a pleasant experience, but let's not over exaggerate the situation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Let's wait for the feel suits to arrive before equating virtual "crimes" to real ones, especially in a medium where you can just block anyone, at most this should go in the same place a death threat via text goes for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago

Please don't kill people in Counter strike or they might get PTSD

[–] ICastFist 32 points 10 months ago

The victim was in an online 'room' with a large number of fellow users when the virtual assault by several adult men took place.

Taken from the DailyMail. Neither article has details on which VR game/app she was, nor what kind of "assault" it was. The dailymail says it was "on the metaverse", but "metaverse" could be VRChat, Fortnite or fucking Second Life for all we know. Could've even been on fuckzuck's metaverse, Horizon Worlds, but isn't it the place where you don't have a bottom half and other avatars are forced to stay the equivalent of 1.5m away from you at all times?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

the Daily Mail

Ah yes so file this under shit that never happened.

Assaulting someone in a VR game is still assault especially if they never consented.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

The fact that this is even compared to real SA is so fucked up. At least on the internet or game you can leave, it's not like your forced to endure the actions or behavior of other people.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

What a joke.

Real crimes are being compared to vr "crimes". Next will be thought crimes.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (10 children)

Are you fucking kidding me?

They took cops off of real cases to work a VIRTUAL ASSAULT in a video game. (just harassment, not assault btw)

JFC I hope we fucking get nuked soon. We don't deserve to live.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

I just feel like this would set a negative precedent for interactions in online games. Idk tho, not a lawyer.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Oh for fucks sake

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's harassment. The game or platform should ban or punish the user. This should be protected under free speech. It's still disgusting though.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

why would sexually harassing children fall under free speech? I agree with you that it's not assault, but even in the absence of assault this behavior wouldn't be protected speech in real life and it shouldn't be protected speech online

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The game should ban the offender but I can't not think involving the police is a bit ridiculous and waste of resources.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think harassment is probably more appropriate, unless said metaverse somehow allows the sexual assault of avatars, which I don't think exists. I mean, IIRC Second Life technically has sex animations but afaik you have to strictly opt into that stuff. People can't just go around and use your avatar for it and even then it would be the question why she went into such a place & features if she didn't wanted to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Just one count of assault? I've been teabagged online more times than I can count.

load more comments
view more: next ›