Good. With Poland on the way out, who's protecting him again? Austria? Eventually they're going to have to attack Hungary head-on, one way or the other.
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
69 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
8368 readers
401 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The problem is that Poland has not had a new government until a few weeks ago. With a PiS government that was not possible. The other problem is that it takes time. Ukraine does not have that and this is faster then dealing with Hungary right now.
Probably going to happen though, but Slovakia might block it.
who’s protecting him again?
Slovakia now: https://www.npr.org/2023/10/01/1202879797/pro-russia-ex-premier-leads-party-to-win-slovakia-parliamentary-elections
Ah, right.
I worry about the precedent that this sets. My understanding is that the EU has been as successful as it has in large part because of the fact that many decisions like this require unanimity, and bypassing that may lead to an overall weakening of the union.
Frankly, I think the other 26 members should seriously be looking into the possibility of ejecting Hungary from the bloc. It's absolutely absurd that Orban has been able to hold the entire EU hostage time and time again, and I don't really see any other way to remedy the problem short of a full-on revolution in Hungary.
This had been an ongoing topic for a while and unanimity is quite frankly not very favorable at the Union's current size, especially if it wants to expand even further. The more members you have, the harder it becomes to vote on just about anything. And it simply requires just a single bad actor to really fuck things up, which we had more than just one too. Qualified majority votes will have to be the future if the EU wants to be able to function.
The areas the EU has been successful in usually do not require unanimity. In terms of the common market, that is for the most part a simple majority or a qualified majority. That also includes a lot of environmental laws and standardization. The Euro is not used by all members and some do not want to join at all.
In terms of foreign policy we can see the problems with Orban right now. It kind of works, but as soon as anybody has a problem it starts to cause massive problems for everybody. There is a reason treaty negotiations have been started again.
There is no process for ejecting a member state.